Soviets OP

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

FIRST. Gotta start the thread train somewhere.

I feel the Soviet arsenal of units are some of the most overpowered and challenging things to deal with as Axis this patch, without proper AT support I can't counter the hordes upon hordes of Quads, SU-76s, and T-70s! Relic needs to nerf everything in t3 immediately.

Posts: 670

21 Jul 2015, 17:42 PMVonIvan

FIRST. Gotta start the thread train somewhere. I feel the Soviet arsenal of units are some of the most overpowered and challenging things to deal with as Axis this patch, without proper AT support I can't counter the hordes upon hordes of Quads, SU-76s, and T-70s! Relic needs to nerf everything in t3 immediately.

I agree. I also believe Wehrmacht T4 is too cheap, Relic has to raise its price.

Posts: 1122

I want to do cpt molo style m5 instead of m3 spam.

Playercard of Jadame

	4v4: P	streak: + 3
	4v4: P	streak: + 9
	4v4: P	streak: + 3
	4v4: P	streak: + 9

Multi Quote

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

You have to build AT?! wtf!

The views and opinions expressed in my posts and topics are solely those of the Napalm. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Relic, the developers, The Angry Bears and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Multi Quote

Posts: 509

21 Jul 2015, 17:42 PMVonIvan

FIRST. Gotta start the thread train somewhere. I feel the Soviet arsenal of units are some of the most overpowered and challenging things to deal with as Axis this patch, without proper AT support I can't counter the hordes upon hordes of Quads, SU-76s, and T-70s! Relic needs to nerf everything in t3 immediately.

I have the numbers here (http://www.coh2.org/topic/36782/teching-analysis-and-faction-comparison-re-july-21-patch). Agree with you, needs a rework.

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

21 Jul 2015, 17:46 PMJadame!

I want to do cpt molo style m5 instead of m3 spam.

i was the first one who did dbl flamer in M5

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Allies 49% in matchmaking WTF relic so OP!

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote

Posts: 509

Wondered when Katitof would show up trying to justify this.

OT ost T3 cannot be price decreased. Would be tremendously unfair to USF, they already have higher teching cost to access shermans than ost does for p4. M5 needs nerf, decrease su76 barrage range to 60 and/or increase barrage scatter and make range 70; or make sov t3 more wxpensive id say. You cant have best midgame vehicles AND cheapest tech prices.

Posts: 155

My goodness you need to build at-guns...shriiiiek... and I almost wanted to write that I like the new Stugs... they pound the hell out of the T34-76. Stugs are op

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

21 Jul 2015, 18:00 PMSgt.Chickenface

My goodness you need to build at-guns...shriiiiek... and I almost wanted to write that I like the new Stugs... they pound the hell out of the T34-76. Stugs are op .

Posts: 509

Building ATguns isnt an issue. Always build them anyway. Atleast I do. The issue is the large fuel gap between ost and sov t3 (ive got a link there with numbers) and the opportunity this gives sov in the matchup, assuming equal skill on both sides. The numbers worry me.