Login

russian armor

Dev Diary pt1: UKF - From History to Gameplay

20 Jul 2015, 18:13 PM
#21
avatar of CasTroy

Posts: 559

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 16:31 PMJadame!
Cant wait to build some 17 pounders to feed axis with taste of their own paks 43.

That´s what I´m really afraid of as playing Ostheer. But fancy this idea when playing U.S. Forces. Double-edged sword. ;)
20 Jul 2015, 18:28 PM
#22
avatar of AvNY

Posts: 862



Barton, Avny, this is a videogame..."authenticity", to whatever degree this can be realised in the first place, should not exactly be at the forefront of priorities.



Well... yeah! That was my point.

"historical" arguments need to cut both ways, as should "balance" arguments. You don't get to pick and choose one or the other depending on the argument you want to make.
20 Jul 2015, 18:31 PM
#23
avatar of BartonPL

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 17:38 PMAvNY


Likewise there were only 3 engagements ever recorded in which the US faced Tiger I's, so should they be banned from Ost when facing USF?

If the war had gone on the new Allied tech would have faced and overmatched the Germans. They just happened to defeat them pretty quickly without the advanced tech (of course in reality Allied late game was much more powerful than Axis late game).


20 Jul 2015, 18:35 PM
#24
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 18:28 PMAvNY



Well... yeah! That was my point.

"historical" arguments need to cut both ways, as should "balance" arguments. You don't get to pick and choose one or the other depending on the argument you want to make.

Well, maybe I misunderstood you there, but my point was actually that historical arguments shoud cut neither way and have to be entirely detached from balance considerations if you want to make a properly balanced, competitive videogame. ;)

In retrospect it is strikingly obvious that the Germans were doomed to defeat, but that does not make for a entertaining gameplay experience.
20 Jul 2015, 18:45 PM
#25
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561




Oh you are totally right. Those early jets and maus would have been totally useful vs an atom bomb/s

Let's be honest, if the war had lasted longer, the only difference would be that there would be a few less German cities on the map.
20 Jul 2015, 18:45 PM
#26
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 16:25 PMPorygon


Mortar emplacement taking 38 Panther shots before death. :snfPeter:


please don't tell me this is true ...
20 Jul 2015, 18:48 PM
#27
avatar of nigo
Senior Editor Badge

Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15

please don't tell me this is true ...


:snfPeter:
20 Jul 2015, 18:54 PM
#28
avatar of Barrier
Patrion 28

Posts: 146



please don't tell me this is true ...

Brace yourself for NDA warnings!
20 Jul 2015, 18:57 PM
#29
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225

In the sweet words of the virgin Mary: What the fuck?
20 Jul 2015, 18:58 PM
#30
avatar of BartonPL

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6


Oh you are totally right. Those early jets and maus would have been totally useful vs an atom bomb/s

Let's be honest, if the war had lasted longer, the only difference would be that there would be a few less German cities on the map.


ohh jeez... you also deserve facepalm image :snfBarton:
20 Jul 2015, 19:01 PM
#31
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1


Oh you are totally right. Those early jets and maus would have been totally useful vs an atom bomb/s

Let's be honest, if the war had lasted longer, the only difference would be that there would be a few less German cities on the map.


Ah yes, turning half of europe into radioactive rubble and poisoning the water supply sounds like a grand idea.

Although funny enough America did come pretty close to nuking the USSR because idiots like Patton and Churchill were allowed to continue to be in charge of things when they should have been locked in a storage container when the war was done.
20 Jul 2015, 19:23 PM
#32
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561



Ah yes, turning half of europe into radioactive rubble and poisoning the water supply sounds like a grand idea.

that didn't stop them them in Japan
20 Jul 2015, 19:35 PM
#33
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

that didn't stop them them in Japan


Japan is an Island surrounded by water and at the time of WW2 was nowhere near as dense as Western Europe was.
20 Jul 2015, 20:15 PM
#35
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

Guys no.

Please.

Stop.
20 Jul 2015, 20:17 PM
#36
avatar of squippy

Posts: 484

I was reading some stuff by an nuke disarmament group a while back that cited a study which estimated that a full scale WW3 exchange would only produce a further 50k casualties worldwide from radiation effects. Radiation is nasty stuff but also exaggerated.
20 Jul 2015, 20:22 PM
#37
avatar of IpKaiFung
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1708 | Subs: 2

I have to say that these videos do a better job at selling the game than those piss poor pc gamer, eurogamer etc. articles that are poorly written by a guy who clearly doesn't give two shits about the game.

I know those sites draw massive traffic but I believe they would be better off just putting these videos out instead.
20 Jul 2015, 20:44 PM
#38
avatar of Zupadupadude

Posts: 618

most maps are in Holland, and still brits have Comet that never fought there and barely had seen fight in Germany, makes sense, why don't Germans get Maus's or E-series tanks :snfBarton:
actually there were only like one or two maps set in holland, most were set in germany
20 Jul 2015, 20:45 PM
#39
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

I have to say that these videos do a better job at selling the game than those piss poor pc gamer, eurogamer etc. articles that are poorly written by a guy who clearly doesn't give two shits about the game.

I know those sites draw massive traffic but I believe they would be better off just putting these videos out instead.


I agree
21 Jul 2015, 03:14 AM
#40
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

most maps are in Holland, and still brits have Comet that never fought there and barely had seen fight in Germany, makes sense, why don't Germans get Maus's or E-series tanks :snfBarton:


Are they? What's your source? There are definitely maps in Germany so I don't know why you'd complain about Comet. Like oh my god there's a Stalingrad map in VCoh2, Ostheer and Soviets both have later war stuff! Let's whine about that.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

679 users are online: 679 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49066
Welcome our newest member, uk88world
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM