Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Yes, but both axis factions have RIGHT TOOLS for it.
No side costs for AT/faust/shreck.
They have it from the get go.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Soviets have AT right from the get go and USF can get Zooks and BAR at the same time. Now that the Maxim has AoE suppression as well going for T2 has Soviets is a very smart decision against OKW and Ostheer even.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Where is that T0 AT gun you speak of?
Oh, you mean ZiS?
Well sorry sunshine, but not everyone goes T2 100% of the time, while puppchen is always T0 and ost always goes T2, pfaust is always there without side costs as well.
Imagine how fun it would be if you always had to go for puma as OKW, because that would be your only early AT or if the puppchen was in that tier.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I would fire the KT into space and crucify the Puppchen if I could build a real AT gun from one of my tech buildings. Honestly I think the puppchen is a failed experiment and it would be nice if they removed the garrisoning gimmick and just make it not die to a stiff breeze and have 60 range.
Against OKW were countering maxim spam is already an uphill battle I don't see a reason to not go T2 as it;
-negates Mech HQ
-allows you to suppress das volkblob
-bombard enemy BG HQ with indirect fire
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
That argument lost any relevance with last patch where puppchen got superior camo.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Where is that T0 AT gun you speak of?
Oh, you mean ZiS?
Well sorry sunshine, but not everyone goes T2 100% of the time, while puppchen is always T0 and ost always goes T2, pfaust is always there without side costs as well.
Imagine how fun it would be if you always had to go for puma as OKW, because that would be your only early AT or if the puppchen was in that tier.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Bugs are not balance.
One day, when you'll grow old and tired you might actually understand that.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 1617
I can't see how you are not able to go T2 as Sov (even if you went T1 first)
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
Soviets have AT right from the get go
I would fire the KT into space and crucify the Puppchen if I could build a real AT gun from one of my tech buildings.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 1484
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Its really not that hard to faust and Pak combo to destroy T-70.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If you take faust + 2 pak shot, you did something wrong, but anyway, the real problem will be quads spam, not T70 (If we agree that we are all talking of 1v1 ... the risk of using light vehicules in other modes are exponantial, imo)
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Well, OKW have pumas, ost isn't hardcapped for single 222.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Thanks for keeping my signature updated.
Earliest AT with; stock cloak, small target size, garrison capability, increased arc and Rof while garrisoned, and retreat, not good enough?
Stop complaining
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
If i remember correctly, Quad will kill 222 very very quickly, 222 will not do enough damage.
Can someone test how do 2 222 against 1 Quad ?
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
1 
Posts: 764
If i remember correctly, Quad will kill 222 very very quickly, 222 will not do enough damage.
Can someone test how do 2 222 against 1 Quad ?
 |
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
220 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
