Posts: 151
Um no. Every engagement would go to the squad that fires first. Not to mention the long range units would have the upper hand 8/10 times.
Posts: 589
I've played alot of 1v1 Wehrmact games, never seen it once, at all.
I agree with you bud, not a good idea.
I would love to see Shocks at max range dealing suppression to red cover grens.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Im generally interested if people like the ability for main line infantry to suppress?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
It's very easy to reproduce. Just have 1 squad of grens vs any infantry in neutral cover or less, and the infantry squad will become suppressed 10/10 times.
Posts: 589
No
1 
Posts: 2885
Posts: 151
That depends if its on allies or axis side.
When rifles could do that, the gates of hell would break open with nerf cries
Posts: 589
Some of you dont experience it because of a simple fact: it never happens to squads in cover, there is no map in this game that would force cons to engage in neutral cover so only ppl who 'forget' to use cover experience this. It also makes a problem much less of an issue.
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
1 Posts: 2885
Are you implying that cons will win an engagement whilst in cover against a gren squad in cover?
Sometimes, you need to attack a position. Traversing neutral cover is often involved.
Posts: 589
It is but it is not fast enough to suppress you, jumping from cover to cover is possible while attacking and distances from one to another are small on pretty much all maps. Also I agree that the supression value is at least to high. Just explained why some ppl dont experience it.
I also have problem beating wehr as sovs this patch but this is mostly due to mgs suppressing in green cover, what is much more of an issue.
Posts: 589
Posts: 923
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Ah I see. So you think it's fair that a player facing grens is required to micro hi infantry from cover to cover or be suppressed, when OKW and OKH don't have to do so?
I'm pretty sure Relic said they were looking at evening out the micro requirements for allies, rather than increasing them...
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 255
Posts: 67
Just waiting on the videos to be uploaded...
This is the last thing I will respond to you on until then. If you want to continue spouting shit and lies after that, I might change my mind.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
You guys know how small the chance of this happening is right? The reason why it's seen on cons more often like I said is they are you easier to hit combined with the fact they have a high model count.
But the biggest influence of this little bit of suppression is probably that it makes the HMG42 even better. Than the other Machine guns because grens can keep suppressed squads suppressed longer than rifles or conscripts can, allowing the Ostheer player to switch targets more freely.
Posts: 589
Not a video, but I reproduced this easily.
http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/437196233201258960/5FF2C643DF22A1957BB6B03F741D94CDFCE974E5/
Posts: 2053
You guys know how small the chance of this happening is right? The reason why it's seen on cons more often like I said is they are you easier to hit combined with the fact they have a high model count.
 |
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
46 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
0 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
