Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » What good is the tiger tank?

What good is the tiger tank?

PAGES (14)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Katitof
11 May 2015, 12:58 PM
#21
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 08:24 AMausterlitz


Wrong - is-2 costs same as tiger.And outperforms it by a mile.
And is-2 plus zis wins vs tiger and pak.

Calculation was made for that claim you know.
Times is about the same, so its all about if RNG loves you.

The tiger can't beat any enemy lategame armor.Its incapable of fighting on its own,needs constant pak support wholegame to have ANY impact.

Except it beats every single tank except IS-2 1v1.

If you are talking about more then 1 and stronger then normal T34/sherman, then I don't know what do you expect, higher total price wins, nothing wrong with that.



Reason CAS is now most common,because u can fight blob and cheeze from allied side with same.

Reason CAS is most common is because there is so much cheese in it, that Italians have started to open pizzerias after selecting it.

And lowbie axis players love cheese.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Burts
11 May 2015, 13:23 PM
#22
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

Lol at this thread and lol at alex saying that IS-2 is better againts infantry with his complete inability to understand anything.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
dasheepeh
11 May 2015, 13:30 PM
#23
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

Do you still expect to call in your tiger and steamroll the allied side, laughing at their cute little panzers trying to penetrate your krupp steel beast? Glad these days are over.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel

b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast

fan of the illustrious black prince
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
coh2player
11 May 2015, 13:36 PM
#24
avatar of coh2player

Posts: 1571

For the first year of the game's life, the Tiger was literally an I-win button. It was common to get 1 tiger, and then attempt to get a second to seal the deal..
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
TheSleep3r
11 May 2015, 13:40 PM
#25
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670

This is end of the war, not normandy

You cry about tiger getting #rekt every tiem against things that were developed to counter it in late 1944

Yet you still refuse to talk about conscripts as the core of soviet army in the same 1944






jump backJump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 16:49 PMREforever
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WingZero
11 May 2015, 14:14 PM
#26
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 13:40 PMTheSleep3r
This is end of the war, not normandy

You cry about tiger getting #rekt every tiem against things that were developed to counter it in late 1944

Yet you still refuse to talk about conscripts as the core of soviet army in the same 1944


Spot on! Like the guy said above, Tiger should be used with combined arms and you will see the difference.












Playercard of WingZero

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with STALKER ★★★, -NSO-Sasha, & Happy Camper
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
11 May 2015, 14:28 PM
#27
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 13:40 PMTheSleep3r
This is end of the war, not normandy

You cry about tiger getting #rekt every tiem against things that were developed to counter it in late 1944

Yet you still refuse to talk about conscripts as the core of soviet army in the same 1944

Couldn't have worded it better myself.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
CookiezNcreem
11 May 2015, 14:56 PM
#28
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

Just another Ostheerlitz tear thread
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Aerohank
11 May 2015, 15:43 PM
#29
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

Out of all the things that is wrong with the axis vs allies balance, the tiger tank is not one of them.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
dasheepeh
11 May 2015, 15:48 PM
#30
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 14:56 PMCookiezNcreem
Just another Ostheerlitz tear thread


:snfPeter:
servant to the vet 5 königskübel

b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast

fan of the illustrious black prince
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Australian Magic
11 May 2015, 15:52 PM
#31
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Tiger is very good unit. It's not a-move over everything. It's your first line unit which should be followed by Grens and 2 Paks40.

Jackson? Useless agasint infantry, so use your infantry.
Sherman? Keep 1-2 Pak40 behind.
There is no need for Tiger if it's so bad as you say.
P47? Just rotate Tiger straight into plane - rockets will smash next to Tiger.

Combine with blitz and doctrine with smoke.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Butcher
11 May 2015, 16:00 PM
#33
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 13:40 PMTheSleep3r
This is end of the war, not normandy
Many consider the Normandy campaign to be the end of the war. A third German frontline, what else would you call that? :p

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 13:40 PMTheSleep3r

You cry about tiger getting #rekt every tiem against things that were developed to counter it in late 1944
If things are developed to counter a thing they can still fail at doing so. For example: The 50mm gun was mounted on the Panzer III to make it better versus the T-34. Yet it still struggled with the T-34 from the front. Something similar applies to the 85mm on the T-34 to counter Panthers and Tigers. It just somewhat helped, yet didn´t change the onesided engagements.

In game I also feel that the Tiger is somewhat unreliable as a damage sponge. It deals good damage to infantry but has to immediately be pulled off the frontlines since the survivability buffs on vet were deleted and the health was reduced.

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 13:40 PMTheSleep3r

Yet you still refuse to talk about conscripts as the core of soviet army in the same 1944
Conscript is just a name. What do you think the Grenadiers mostly are? Conscripted Grenadiers. It´s just for some diversity in the units names. My granduncle was Panzergrenadier and conscripted.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
11 May 2015, 16:33 PM
#34
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 14:56 PMCookiezNcreem
Just another Ostheerlitz tear thread

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
__deleted__
11 May 2015, 16:46 PM
#35
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225

The Tiger, in a strictly unit vs unit comparison, indeed has tangibly less utility than either the IS-2 or a pair of 85s and in fact is countered by either of them to a degree. In fact, if you need to deal with Shock rifle specifically, the Elefant is your only really reliable option.
However, that does not mean the Tiger is useless at all, as it performs well against infantry, can absorb punishment and brings staying power to lategame OH.

By the way, the vast majority of both German and Soviet infantrymen were...conscripted. The Soviets continued to raise poorly trained rifle formations throughout 1944 from the newly reclaimed territories, and in fact started to experience somewhat of a manpower crisis as the war drew to a close, as they continued to be brutally attrited even in the last 2 years of the war.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WingZero
11 May 2015, 16:54 PM
#36
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 14:56 PMCookiezNcreem
Just another Ostheerlitz tear thread


:clap:
Playercard of WingZero

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with STALKER ★★★, -NSO-Sasha, & Happy Camper
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
synThrax
11 May 2015, 17:11 PM
#37
avatar of synThrax
Donator 11

Posts: 144

Just avoid using it vs. anything with mark target and callins. But i'Il tend to throw them away anyway. :facepalm:
Fun fact if i have my 5th Tiger there is almost zero resistance left. :D
AND sometimes i'm really shocked why a sherman can penetrate its front lol..

All in all it still is a very good anti-everything tank, but tread lightly. ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv4UqrWV2_U
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
austerlitz
11 May 2015, 17:30 PM
#39
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

jump backJump back to quoted post11 May 2015, 12:58 PMKatitof

Calculation was made for that claim you know.
Times is about the same, so its all about if RNG loves you.


Except it beats every single tank except IS-2 1v1.

If you are talking about more then 1 and stronger then normal T34/sherman, then I don't know what do you expect, higher total price wins, nothing wrong with that.




Reason CAS is most common is because there is so much cheese in it, that Italians have started to open pizzerias after selecting it.

And lowbie axis players love cheese.


In game i have never seen ONCE is-2 lose to tiger with or without pak-zis support on both side.

Doesn't matter t-34/85s or is-2 is soviet lategame armor -loses to both.
Jacksons -usf lategame.again loses.

Indeed blob and cheese of cAS is only way to deal with allied blob and cheese atm.I don't blame them.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (14)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » What good is the tiger tank?

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1001
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

378 users are online: 378 guests
0 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48733
Welcome our newest member, service
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM