Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » Do you enjoy playing USF?

Do you enjoy playing USF?

PAGES (2)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Katitof
28 Apr 2015, 13:13 PM
#21
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 13:03 PMJohnnyB


Is there any faction, in your conception, or game, that is not bad designed?

Wehr.

You have diverse tiers which encourage combined arms.
You have multiple stock infantry and armor upgrades, allowing for what is mostly missing in coh2-decision making and actual resource management(to a point USF also got that).
You are encouraged, but not forced to pick specific doctrines.
You have good infantry and armor scaling.
Most units and off-maps have a role and are usable(aka no completely useless ones, maybe except encirclement doc one).
You have linear power progression, you are not punished for picking wrong tier.
You have EXCELLENT resource management possibilities through luftwaffe supply, luftwaffe support, Mechanized support and osttruppen doctrines.


The single problem they have is the T3 to T4 transition cost and maybe T1 to T2 as well.

3 remaining armies have pretty huge design flaws related to tier structure, munition management and teching choices.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
JohnnyB
28 Apr 2015, 13:40 PM
#22
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 13:13 PMKatitof

Wehr.



And it's the weakest of all. Does this tell you something? Apparently, "bad design" and "successfull faction" are directly proportional terms.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WingZero
28 Apr 2015, 13:54 PM
#23
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

I enjoy playing USF, seems like an uphill battle from the start. I like challenges and the challenge is to defeat the Axis player before he gets out KT/heavy.

Playing OKW makes me feel dirty, I need to wash my hands after cause it is too easy.












Playercard of WingZero

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with STALKER ★★★, -NSO-Sasha, & Happy Camper
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
28 Apr 2015, 13:57 PM
#24
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 13:40 PMJohnnyB


And it's the weakest of all. Does this tell you something? Apparently, "bad design" and "successfull faction" are directly proportional terms.

You are confusing design and balance.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
dasheepeh
28 Apr 2015, 14:02 PM
#25
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

I love USF. I can safely say its by far my favourite at the moment, although i didnt like it at all at first.

But i just love their units and the versatility. Their main tank, the Sherman, is a all - in - one package with its munition types and smoke projectiles. I also like every single doctrine they have. Yes, im one of the few that enjoy using the wc51.

Soviets are fun in theory, but are currently too limited in competetively viable builds and OKW is just OKW. Not sure how to think about OKW right now. Ostheer is extremely fun, imo. 2nd place for me.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel

b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast

fan of the illustrious black prince
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Neo
28 Apr 2015, 14:40 PM
#26
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 13:40 PMJohnnyB


And it's the weakest of all. Does this tell you something? Apparently, "bad design" and "successfull faction" are directly proportional terms.


It's not the weakest this patch - OKW is (in 1v1).

I agree that Ostheer is the most balanced and rounded faction.

Personally, I actually like OKW design too. It's definitely something different without being one-dimensional... very Soviet-like actually with tiers that lock you into completely different units and diverse call-in elite infantry.












Playercard of Neo

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Loki
28 Apr 2015, 15:13 PM
#27
avatar of Loki

Posts: 96

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 01:42 AMCookiezNcreem
I pinch my nipples and giggle like a little girl while playing USF


Bahahahahahaha
Playercard of Mauritius

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Burts
28 Apr 2015, 15:17 PM
#28
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

I honeslty like all of the factions.

Soviets are probaly my favourite, simply due to the high count of viable and good strategies (just my opinion).

USF/Ostheer is a close second. I find them very fun to play.


OKW is probaly the least interesting faction for me, dont have a big problem with them, but thats just me.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Ace of Swords
28 Apr 2015, 15:25 PM
#29
avatar of Ace of Swords

Posts: 219

I get bored really quickly of the, despire the doctrine the general strategy is always the same in all game modes, spam rifles > get 1 or 2 light vehicles > proceed into sherman or jackson spam or a mix of them.

There's 0 variety, and outside the micro required the skill cap is low.
Playercard of Ace of Swords

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: None
1v1: P2v2: None3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: None3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PanzerGeneralForever
28 Apr 2015, 17:20 PM
#30
avatar of PanzerGeneralForever

Posts: 1072





USF Build order--> Rifle, rifle, rifle, (elite riflemen if you have the commander), rifle, ambulance or Lt, rifle rifle rifle rifle rifle.......M20 --->>> Sherman Sherman Sherman Sherman... They can basically play the whole game with 2 units. Steal enemy paks mgs and mortars and you have an army :)

If you wanna switch it up you can get other core infantry units like paras or Pathfinders but thats all commander specific stuff.

WFAs are both very boring imo because they are both centered around their core infantry units.

Wehrmacht you can play with only 1-2 grens and support weapons and still have a GG.

"Too one dimensional" Exactly.

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 01:41 AMAssaultPlazma
I did not vote as there is no middle ground. But will say for the most part its too one dimensional. Just rifles into M20 and on to Shermans basically some of this because certain units kinda sucking rest is just bad design.

What I cant stand is Relics insistence to try to create SUPER UNIQUE factions in a game BUILT AROUND REAL WORLD ARMIES THAT ALL USED COMBINED ARMS In the end we just always end with gimmicky factions that always seem to encourage blobbing. This idea that factions should lack important weapon systems like mortars or getting MGs late is horrible!

I'd love to see both WFA get reworks so that they both have support early and good support weapons with weaker infantry so as to encourage blobbing.

USF Should get heavy Tanks
OKW SHOULD have medium tanks!
Soviet stock armor Should be viable!

ETC ETC ETC.......

Inb4 "want all factions to be the same"
https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198060148756
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
28 Apr 2015, 17:30 PM
#31
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

Fun to play: OKW >= Soviets > Ost > USF

USF is simply not fun to play as highlighted earlier because there is extremely little unit variant's. To little infantry, and they took all the most boring shermans to use.

Like it's a complete joke the most fun and reliable Sherman is a Soviet unit.

EDIT: lol at all the people saying OKW is to easy to play.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (2)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
0 user is browsing this thread:
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » Do you enjoy playing USF?

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1231
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

678 users are online: 678 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM