Passive Defenses
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedPosts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
because if defenses were worthwhile everyone would complain about sim city and turtling. Isnt that usually how it works with RTS games?
Posts: 542
Posts: 640
If some green cover which might be useful for my enemy is near a ressource point / VP I will place some wire around it.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 2181
And that is why artillery was invented
and the encirclement commander
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
and the encirclement commander
If there only was an allied strat based on camping on weapon teams or forwarded, repairable reinforce outpost for the commander to actually have a situation to be used with
Teams balancing the game and recognizing meta and teams responsible for new commanders should really talk to each other more then once a year
Posts: 59
If there only was an allied strat based on camping on weapon teams or forwarded, repairable reinforce outpost for the commander to actually have a situation to be used with
Teams balancing the game and recognizing meta and teams responsible for new commanders should really talk to each other more then once a year
That's what Urban Defense Tactics is all about Katie
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
That's what Urban Defense Tactics is all about Katie
By the time encirclement doc gets proper unlocks, FHQ will be downed by stuka, torched by MHT or worn down by turbomortars, contrary to its name its not a defensive doc, but really offensive one, YOLO offensive level.
Posts: 521
By the time encirclement doc gets proper unlocks, FHQ will be downed by stuka, torched by MHT or worn down by turbomortars, contrary to its name its not a defensive doc, but really offensive one, YOLO offensive level.
It would feel right at home at here.
Posts: 59
By the time encirclement doc gets proper unlocks, FHQ will be downed by stuka, torched by MHT or worn down by turbomortars, contrary to its name its not a defensive doc, but really offensive one, YOLO offensive level.
But Katie, the FHQ gives you a Defensive Bonus! Not an Offensive Bonus, a Defensive one with the Shield on top!
Posts: 721
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedPosts: 2742
I rarely use tank traps because they're not even an available option unless I'm USF, in which case I'm already sad because my Rear Eschelons can't lay mines, which undermines most of the utility of tank traps. Also, as USF, it's hard to justify blocking off areas of the map to tanks because USF always needs as much maneuverability as possible against Axis armor because of the whole no heavy tanks thing. And if the USF is trying to lay anti-tank mines they're doing it with an M20, (which means the captain is delayed, and by extension, ATGs) which ultimately means that those tank traps aren't redirecting enemy armor anywhere meaningful.
And if they are blocking off traffic towards USF ATGs, mines, and bazookas, it almost by definition has to be the lategame.
Also the Axis heavy tanks I believe just straight up crush tank traps, which further makes them useless. Which makes most of those defenses completely obsolete by the late game.
Livestreams
195 | |||||
32 | |||||
14 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger