Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » Paratrooper Thompson

Paratrooper Thompson

PAGES (4)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
What Doth Life?!
23 Mar 2015, 19:42 PM
#21
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 16:00 PMturbotortoise
<444>3 the thompson, give me two more plz :D
but yeah, there is literally 0 drawback to 30's, whereas as mentioned, the thompson can be situational, i only prefer them 'cos they make a cool sound and can wipe squads if you get a really good flank, which is fun. tactical assault is cruel if you can managed to jump some low health retreating squads. also, 3 survival instinct bulletins can be a lot of fun. :D


There is a glaring drawback to .30s compared to Thompsons: dropping them for the enemy.

The Thompson "focus fire" or whatever it's called ability will melt just about anything on two feet if you activate it in close range.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Pedro_Jedi
23 Mar 2015, 19:55 PM
#22
avatar of Pedro_Jedi

Posts: 543

I like to use Para's Thompsons on maps like Kholodny, Semois, Stalingrad and the like. They demand micro, but when you do make it good, that's so great.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
CookiezNcreem
23 Mar 2015, 20:38 PM
#23
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 18:15 PMATCF






I love it. Haha good ol cap'n speirs
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
23 Mar 2015, 20:44 PM
#24
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 18:46 PMAustralian Magic


I belive Assault Guards use only 3 Ppsh, like Cons while Shocks have 6 of them.

In the end you get Shocks - amazing close combat unit and Assault grens - pure pudding without good dps at any range.


Assault Guards use 6 PPsH. They also have a better nade than Shocks.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
comm_ash
23 Mar 2015, 20:59 PM
#25
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 20:44 PMAlexzandvar


Assault Guards use 6 PPsH. They also have a better nade than Shocks.


No, they have 3 ppsh and 3 SVT. No armor or real DPS, so they aren't very good.
Playercard of comm_ash

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 11
1v1: Pstreak: + 8
1v1: Pstreak: + 9



Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Thunderhun
23 Mar 2015, 21:04 PM
#26
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

Thompsons are the best CQC weapons for a 6 man squad, no need to buff or de-buff
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
23 Mar 2015, 21:06 PM
#27
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 20:59 PMcomm_ash


No, they have 3 ppsh and 3 SVT. No armor or real DPS, so they aren't very good.


Well technically the 3 SVT's give them better DPS over range than Shocks; but this makes one wonder why regular guards don't have SVT's.

Technically 3 Guards with SVT's + 3 with PPsH = More DPS than guards at every range except when regular ones get their 2 DP's.

:S

EDIT: And no squads except shocks have armor anymore.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Vuther
23 Mar 2015, 21:15 PM
#28
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

Paras' Thompsons are fine, getting in close and hitting Tactical Assault is one of my absolute favourite things in the game. The problem lies more in LMGs being too good (including Paras' own, of course).
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
turbotortoise
23 Mar 2015, 22:38 PM
#29
avatar of turbotortoise

Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4

there's also nothing more tragic then thinking you got the perfect flank, popping tactical assault, having something go awry and watching their broken ass retreat of doom. :\

may as well try to michael jackson moonwalk back to hq...
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Neo
23 Mar 2015, 23:00 PM
#30
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 18:39 PMAlexzandvar


Both Shocks and Assault Guards use the PPsH.


Except shocks have 6 of them and armour. Apart from that they are exactly the same…
Playercard of Neo

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
23 Mar 2015, 23:01 PM
#31
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 23:00 PMNeo


Except shocks have 6 of them and armour. Apart from that they are exactly the same…



Well technically the 3 SVT's give them better DPS over range than Shocks; but this makes one wonder why regular guards don't have SVT's.

Technically 3 Guards with SVT's + 3 with PPsH = More DPS than guards at every range except when regular ones get their 2 DP's.

:S

EDIT: And no squads except shocks have armor anymore.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
23 Mar 2015, 23:20 PM
#32
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 20:44 PMAlexzandvar


Assault Guards use 6 PPsH. They also have a better nade than Shocks.

3 ppsh and 3 SVTs.

You have no slightest clue so much that its getting to a point of being hilarious(coming here from other thread where you were constantly corrected).

Also, are you shitting me?
You want to argue THREE SVTs being ANY kind of advantage over ppsh?
6 of one or the other is an advantage, mix is a hindrance as squad is bad at cqc, bad at mid range and absolutely dreadful at far while having no rec acc modifier, no armor, no smoke, no close up measure.

But I suppose you'll argue now how assault guards are the best thing below the sun, right?
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Neo
23 Mar 2015, 23:25 PM
#33
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

You demonstrate with every post just how ignorant you are about the way this game works.

The whole point about assault guards that Australian Magic was making was that by having 3 short-range weapons and 3 SVTs they are a squad that is useless at all ranges: they have poor long-range DPS, they have poor mid-range DPS and they have poor short-range DPS.

In your post you try to insinuate that shocks and assault guards are somehow equivalent because they use the same weapon, completely ignoring the fact that shocks have armour and a specialist role: close range combat.

It is incredible to me that you continue to spout this nonsense in different forum threads repeatedly making factual errors (only an hour ago you claimed that the Command Panther coordinated ability does not increase damage taken, to say nothing of you comparing KV1 to a Tiger) and think that anyone takes you seriously.
Playercard of Neo

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
23 Mar 2015, 23:29 PM
#34
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

I didn't say they were equivalent; only that they both have PPsH.

Assault Guards have better DPS close and mid range than regular guards, but not at long range thanks to DP's.

No idea why this statement is so triggering, I don't personally use Lend Lease often at all but acting like Assault Guards SVT's don't give them a mid range edge and PPsH's a close range edge is silly.

But please continue to say the opposite of what I actually said.

EDIT: And Again I'm not saying saying Ass Guards are very good at all, merely that they aren't total garbage like several people have implied.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
elchino7
23 Mar 2015, 23:46 PM
#35
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

I don't know if they have a special profile for Guards with PPSH and SVT (i'll think so), so DPS may vary and you can't just use Cons, Shocks or Penals DPS. Theres a world of difference between Shocks PPSH and cons PPSH, for example.

SVT are carbines, which has a different weapon profile to SMGs.

Conclusion: Assault Guards sucks and are not effective, on the context of it's arriving. It's like having Assault grenadiers arriving at 5CP

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

PSA: remember when using tactical assault, that your units get's received accuracy, making them melt easily.
(Don't use Tactical assault against STG Obers, it doesnt work :()

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
23 Mar 2015, 23:49 PM
#36
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 23:46 PMelchino7
I don't know if they have a special profile for Guards with PPSH and SVT (i'll think so), so DPS may vary and you can't just use Cons, Shocks or Penals DPS. Theres a world of difference between Shocks PPSH and cons PPSH, for example.

SVT are carbines, which has a different weapon profile to SMGs.

Conclusion: Assault Guards sucks and are not effective, on the context of it's arriving. It's like having Assault grenadiers arriving at 5CP

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

PSA: remember when using tactical assault, that your units get's received accuracy, making them melt easily.
(Don't use Tactical assault against STG Obers, it doesnt work :()



COH2 stats doesn't have the Guards PPsH, and the SVT they use is the same as the Penal SVT.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
elchino7
24 Mar 2015, 01:34 AM
#37
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 23:49 PMAlexzandvar


COH2 stats doesn't have the Guards PPsH, and the SVT they use is the same as the Penal SVT.


And how do you know it's the same profile as the Penal SVT?
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Alexzandvar
24 Mar 2015, 01:35 AM
#38
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 01:34 AMelchino7


And how do you know it's the same profile as the Penal SVT?


Assault Guards are listed as using only SVT's, which links to the same rifle used by the Penal Battalion.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
turbotortoise
24 Mar 2015, 04:33 AM
#39
avatar of turbotortoise

Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2015, 19:42 PMWhat Doth Life?!


There is a glaring drawback to .30s compared to Thompsons: dropping them for the enemy.


pfffft. 30cal Para's don't die :P
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
QueenRatchet123
24 Mar 2015, 05:07 AM
#40
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
I dont agree with this thread at all

3 rifles fighing in the center on a map like semoisky

with paras flanking around the side it deadly

i wiped 2 obers with one para squad once

I would like to see an armor buff come with the thomsons

they get forced away easily when focused

I have 3 cost reduction bullitens

thomsons cost 77 muni very deadly
jump backJump back to quoted post17 Aug 2015, 14:01 PMJohnnyB

There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (4)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » Paratrooper Thompson

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
Yesterday, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
Yesterday, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
Yesterday, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
Yesterday, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
Yesterday, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
Yesterday, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
Yesterday, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
Yesterday, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
Yesterday, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
Yesterday, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
Last Friday, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
06 Mar 2025, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
06 Mar 2025, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
06 Mar 2025, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
06 Mar 2025, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
06 Mar 2025, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Livestreams

Treadz
 unknown 67
PacboyA1
 Germany 9

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
13
 Download
Download
1339
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

365 users are online: 365 guests
1 post in the last 24h
22 posts in the last week
67 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52556
Welcome our newest member, Gordy
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM