Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
IRs are RECON and artillery radiomen,
normal pathfinders are more combat oriented.
Give the normal pathfinders a snipe ability and leave IRs alone for the most part.
Edit : a snipe ability like the one from Ardennes assault
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
And JLI are scouts.
Your argument is invalid.
Posts: 17
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
And JLI are scouts.
Your argument is invalid.
Posts: 42
Pathfinders are support and sighting teams, IR Pathfinders are recon and artillery support, JLI are Hunters.
3 different rolls.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
they are? Along with pathfinders,They have huge sight range even at vet 0 and can snipe isolated weaker units. What is the definition of scout?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Yes, they are.
No word about hunting, no word about sniping, scouts and scavengers.
I suppose we should nerf them so they will loose to everything that isn't combat engineer or RET, because they are light infantry meant for reckon and scavenging only according to description and ability kit.
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Yes, they are.
No word about hunting, no word about sniping, scouts and scavengers.
I suppose we should nerf them so they will loose to everything that isn't combat engineer or RET, because they are light infantry meant for reckon and scavenging only according to description and ability kit.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I don't know what you're getting at...what was the point of you saying what you said? I'm completely lost.
I guess you're saying Jli aren't just scouts?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
No, I'm saying they are.
Just like IR pathfinders or pathfinders.
And yet there is a huge disproportion in the actual performance.
Posts: 627
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
No, I'm saying they are.
Just like IR pathfinders or pathfinders.
And yet there is a huge disproportion in the actual performance.
7 Posts: 1664
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I'm pretty sure their 210mp cost means they are intended for re-manning weapon crews... but their reinforce cost is 36 compared to normal pathfinders 37 so FAIL.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 521
You need 3 entities to re man weapon.
You will pay 0 reinforce costs afterwards.
Can you put the pieces together and guess why?
7 Posts: 1664
I think his point is that even if you recrew, there isn't much point because the reinforcement costs will be huge.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Pathfinders and JLI become light combat squads than can crit a model with a reasonably long cooldown at ~40% health or less.
Posts: 627
This is already what we have, Pathfinders can do it at 40% with two rifles, JLI at 80% with one.
Posts: 521
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Alex is right in saying that JLI are marksmen and that they aren't just squads but really infantry hunters. The only problem here is that Pathfinders are the same thing except they scout ahead for airborne troops as well, so the performance they have should really be similar.
 |
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
98 | ||
 |
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
