Login

russian armor

VI B and Teching

2 Jan 2015, 20:38 PM
#41
avatar of JStorm
Benefactor 360

Posts: 93

So OKW should not be able to build the KT if they lose the buildings that acts as a prerequisite for it?

Should Soviets likewise not be able to build anything from T3/T4 if they lose T1/T2?
3 Jan 2015, 03:36 AM
#42
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

only so long as those buildings are destroyed.

no, none of those units have a different tier for a prerequisite. the same is true for OKH and US.
8 Jan 2015, 10:21 AM
#43
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Jan 2015, 20:38 PMJStorm
So OKW should not be able to build the KT if they lose the buildings that acts as a prerequisite for it?

Should Soviets likewise not be able to build anything from T3/T4 if they lose T1/T2?


You can't actually compare them. OKW trucks, specially Flak truck can be used to lock down huge areas of the map early game, and dealing with it is very challenging. Right now all you have to do it to place your flak base somewhere to control most of the map, hold the line with you blob and delay the game and TROLOLOLO with King tiger lat game. Although it's a big loss for OKW to lose that truck, it's not very punishing IMO.
8 Jan 2015, 11:07 AM
#44
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Apparently, mediums are "against the design of OKW" so no dice there Alex. Just like how heavies are against the design of USF. Guess who got the better deal out of those design decisions, lol.


Nowhere did Relic ever say medium tanks were against OKW's design, and the Panzer IV was featured in multiple pre-release screenshots and map loading screens.
8 Jan 2015, 12:14 PM
#45
avatar of KovuTalli

Posts: 332

Honestly, compared to the Panther I'd almost say KT is a "bad tank" Requires too much to tech to in comparison you could have 2 almost 3 Panthers by the time you can afford 1 King.

Panthers repair faster (mostly due to a lower HP Pool), Are faster, have longer range. - ok KT does more damage per shot and is better vs Infantry.

But I find cause of its very slow rotation/speed if the Pathing derps, 9 times out of 10 you'll lose the tank.

I'd honestly rather have a Panther and Sturmtiger over a KT, but that's just my preference lately.

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Jan 2015, 10:21 AMRMMLz


Although it's a big loss for OKW to lose that truck, it's not very punishing IMO.


It can be if you are mid way through building a Panther and a horde of allied tanks suddenly kill it and then take entire map control.
8 Jan 2015, 13:11 PM
#46
avatar of BlackKorp

Posts: 974 | Subs: 2

Currently you can build the VI B as soon as you have built all three buildings, regardless of whether or not they get destroyed. This needs to changes as it is impossible to prevent OKW from building the buildings (due to cheap teching costs) in any remotely close game. Furthermore, OKW can easily float with volk schrecks/obers (particularly with a forward t1/t3) until they shit out a VI B. This is very similar to the tiger ace in that you can punish someone for poor play and then have them magic out a very heavy unit.

The VI B should require all 3 buildings to be currently up in order to build.


One Faction player OKW lover says no! please give 100% fuel income!
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

565 users are online: 565 guests
0 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49388
Welcome our newest member, KETTA
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM