A lil MP increase wouldnt hurt MP floating OKW faction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50f4b/50f4b0b7b75be288248251e49d03c14d7b5e3358" alt=":unsure: :unsure:"
Posts: 444
Posts: 764
Posts: 444
Also not sure why OKW would be floating in MP?
Posts: 764
Posts: 186
Most OKW matches i have watched or played as tend to float MP towards mid or late game compared to US or even ostheer.
Posts: 1130
Wondering whats the reason a FLak HT or Puma costs less in MP than a M20?
A lil MP increase wouldnt hurt MP floating OKW faction
Posts: 1384
Posts: 444
Four crew members in an m20.
Two in a halftrack.
(Also each faction has a different economy. Unit costs exists to control timings more than anything else.)
I am OK with m20 cost any less would encourage spam... But the low mp of aaht or puma can be increased by 50-60 as the timing now is pretty close m20 has bout 40-50 secs to plant more be and harass before a okw light vehicles.
Posts: 444
Four crew members in an m20.
Two in a halftrack.
(Also each faction has a different economy. Unit costs exists to control timings more than anything else.)
I am OK with m20 cost any less would encourage spam... But the low mp of aaht or puma can be increased by 50-60 as the timing now is pretty close m20 has bout 40-50 secs to plant more be and harass before a okw light vehicles.
Posts: 444
Four crew members in an m20.
Two in a halftrack.
(Also each faction has a different economy. Unit costs exists to control timings more than anything else.)
Posts: 2779
Posts: 655
Permanently BannedPosts: 365
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
63 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
81 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
19 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |