Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
well.... 2v2s will be much worse now. We will all know majority of the pro gamers who participate in pushing good balance only view that 1v1s need to be balanced.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Osttruppen Spam incoming
Posts: 246
Posts: 482
Yeah, but we are talking very early game here yes?
OKH have fausts as soon as they get their first building up.
One will cripple a car and two will kill it.
OKW at that time have, um, kubels, storms, volks and raketenwerfer. They are in a better position when they get their first shreks, but before that they are significantly worse off.
 | Playercard of ATOUBA | |||||||
|
Posts: 101
Posts: 4928
-get back guard abuility
-t34-85 need more armor and health > panter front armor to heavy. pz4 easy kill t 34-85 without il-2 marking
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
7 
Posts: 1664
Posts: 1130
Posts: 1217
-get back guard abuilityI don´t see any problem with the current T-34/85 double call in. It doesn´t need more armor and it doesn´t need more health. Currently it has the same health as a Panther. The T-34 is a medium tank. The Panther is de facto more of a heavy than a medium tank. The Panther should be a way more potent vehicle.
-t34-85 need more armor and health > panter front armor to heavy. pz4 easy kill t 34-85 without il-2 marking
Posts: 101
I don´t see any problem with the current T-34/85 double call in. It doesn´t need more armor and it doesn´t need more health. Currently it has the same health as a Panther. The T-34 is a medium tank. The Panther is de facto more of a heavy than a medium tank. The Panther should be a way more potent vehicle.
Also keep in mind that the Pak40 is probably going to get nerfed. So no need at all to increase the T-34/85s performance.
The Panthers front armor was increased last patch, because you could just move towards the Panther and penetrate its front armor without flanking the vehicle.
Also the doctrine offers the mark vehicle ability, which would be overkill coupled with increased performance.
A Panzer IV will reliably lose to a T-34/85 in this game.
Posts: 101
Only if you're willing to pay 175 fuel a piece
Posts: 412
Posts: 1217
1) Sounds like you want Soviet tanks to beat German tanks on an equal basis then. I´m afraid that´s not going to happen for pretty much any reason I can think of (faction design, balance, historical accuracy, fun).
what u talking about? i said about tanks. soviet havent IMBA shreks. so what we see. more shreks spam and IMBA panters or panzer blobs. germans can kill tanks without tanks. soviet cant do that. OKW Panzer IV easy kill t34-85. if u want balance get soviet guards basoka/ ok?
Posts: 101
1) Sounds like you want Soviet tanks to beat German tanks on an equal basis then. I´m afraid that´s not going to happen for pretty much any reason I can think of (faction design, balance, historical accuracy, fun).
2) T-34/85s are strong enough in the AT department. The Panther is supposed to counter tanks, the T-34/85 is omni purpose like the Panzer IV.
3) Sovs have Zis guns and the best mines ingame which actually provide decent AT capabilities.
4) Schrecks aren´t imbalanced as you claim. In fact German AT has never been weaker. The accuracy was tuned down and Paks are going to be weaker. The survivability of Allied tanks is going up by this.
5) I predict that Axis are getting swarmed by medium tanks next patch if the Pak nerf goes life. At the current state it´s already possible to overwhelm Panthers etc. with just one T-34/85 call in, if you know what you are doing. There is no reason to increase their performance.
Posts: 49
1) zis gun fake that pak and germans have pak-43 and more effective pak-40 with super mega health troops. soviet zis -3 kill evety easy.
2) all soviet haved week infantry and die so fast esspecially OKW blobs with g43 profile and mg34 ober.
3) ostr 2 shreks panzergrinaders (2 squad kill all soviets tanks) mg42 spam with 110 sector fire covers
4) guards lose 2-3 man with !!! 1 shoot pz4. so u must retread.
5) germans have bunkers (soviet sucked again) + OKW special units for since controll map.
sooo all germans have best tanks/ best weapons. so when germans have stars - u sucked at late game. all this - big problem in big games 3-4 mode. And its not epic faild if u play in 1-2 mode> because maps small size.
5) so soviet havent good medium tanks at all and germans have panter with strong front armor. its wrong.
so if reic cant fixing this problems many people drop this game. and i dont wanna pay fo new campaing/ because relic cant fix balance long time and sucked every time (usf+soviet) all time.
Posts: 351
Posts: 101
I think that you suffer from Russian COH2 syndrom. You need to follow small niche in order to win. The problem here is not with Germans but rather with Russian linera and expensive teching.
As Russian if you get cought left footed you are f...up. You need to find soluions in call ins. Which is wrong in my humble oppinion.
Posts: 49
no man. i have 1800 hours and when i play with my friend by germans side - its no problem at all. germans have many tactics and many good choice.so u cant find many pic with 100% axis in seaching - its balance problem. some my friends drop playing this game and dont wanna play. they wait good community managers and rebalance at this game with many good fighting tactics in 3-4 mode.
soviet have some good commanders only with B-4 / isu / is-2 unit. another - garbage.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
well.... 2v2s will be much worse now. We will all know majority of the pro gamers who participate in pushing good balance only view that 1v1s need to be balanced.
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
98 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
