Posts: 83
you can blob 2 pgrens with shrecks+2 grens with lmgs just like you can blob 4 rifles (2 zooks+2 bars), I don't really see the difference
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
There is a second unit in the USF that works with Rifleman the Rear Echelon, but with the nerf the Volley Fire had the RE is now a fighting position garisson nothing else.Whoever said that you should use the RE to 1v1. Use a riflemen to take the force while the RE volley them. Still works.
Posts: 209
Whoever said that you should use the RE to 1v1. Use a riflemen to take the force while the RE volley them. Still works.
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Bad RNG i guess. It never fails for me. Though I agree with you that it's a gamble. Needs to be at a middle ground between the original and current stats.
The problem is whenever i use the Volley fire to support my Rifleman its a gamble will or will it not supress the enemy in most cases it fails to do soo and it cost 20 muni. If they redesign Volley fire then the USF could have something like the Kubelwagon but less moble.
Posts: 209
Bad RNG i guess. It never fails for me. Though I agree with you that it's a gamble. Needs to be at a middle ground between the original and current stats.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Bad RNG i guess. It never fails for me. Though I agree with you that it's a gamble. Needs to be at a middle ground between the original and current stats.
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Why wouldn't you blob OKW? They got great infantry such as Obers and Falls for AI and sturdy Schreck Volks. Basically blobbing them allows you to have a death ball that kills everything. Since they are durable, you can blob them without fear of too much incoming dmaageAnd a 203mm shell slowly descends from the blue sky, every man recalling his life's events and saying one final goodbye to their loved ones in their heads.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
I would normally be agaisnt main line infrantry getting AT (volks)
Yet it would be un fair due to the fact that a usf player can equip any infantry unit with double zooks
My problem with usf is how bad they scale.
Mt solution: Buff pen on zooks
Make bars perform simulary to fg42's like they did in real life
buff 57mm penetration
buff jackson penetration
15 
Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
 | Playercard of Romeo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
bazookas don't really need better penetration. They need accuracy. If bazookas get a huge penetration buff then we'll just have super zook blobs running around instead of super shreck blobs. With an accuracy buff they'll actually work against what they're meant to counter: light vehicles. Similarly they should perform well on flanks against enemy armor, but poorly from the front.If we give the bazooka an accuracy buff then it would still be useless against tanks. The bazookas were made to counter tanks after all. At the very least it should be able to penetrate a Panzer IV consistently. It only has 130/120/110 penetration and 80 damage which means it can barely scare a Panzer IV let alone harm it.
Yes the BAR desperately needs a buff.
Yes the 57mm AT gun needs a SMALL buff. It performs horribly against heavy armor without spending a ton of munitions but its Take Aim ability and insane rate of fire shouldn't be written off. I think its AP rounds ability needs a buff though. If you spend the munitions for AP rounds, I think they should never bounce. Maybe very rarely vs super heavies.
Jackson is fine. Honestly if the Jackson penetrated every shot it would be insanely OP.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Bannedbazookas don't really need better penetration. They need accuracy. If bazookas get a huge penetration buff then we'll just have super zook blobs running around instead of super shreck blobs. With an accuracy buff they'll actually work against what they're meant to counter: light vehicles. Similarly they should perform well on flanks against enemy armor, but poorly from the front.
Yes the BAR desperately needs a buff.
Yes the 57mm AT gun needs a SMALL buff. It performs horribly against heavy armor without spending a ton of munitions but its Take Aim ability and insane rate of fire shouldn't be written off. I think its AP rounds ability needs a buff though. If you spend the munitions for AP rounds, I think they should never bounce. Maybe very rarely vs super heavies.
Jackson is fine. Honestly if the Jackson penetrated every shot it would be insanely OP.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 1355
Posts: 2070
And a 203mm shell slowly descends from the blue sky, every man recalling his life's events and saying one final goodbye to their loved ones in their heads.
Some people are plain masochists like me I guess?
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Yes, I know. I think they need a nerf to their survivability especially their volksgrenadiere. Those guys cost 235 mp and but have shock troops survivability.
Im saying they almost become invulnerable to bullets which is silly.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 83
y do volks cost less than cons. yet, outperform them?
Posts: 108 | Subs: 1
y do volks cost less than cons. yet, outperform them?
Posts: 68
 |
|
|
60 | ||
 |
|
|
121 | ||
|
|
|
|
66 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
