Let's talk Soviet faction.
20 Sep 2014, 23:46 PM
#41
Posts: 2779
Why the fuck Gren have difficulty winning 180MP CE squad?
20 Sep 2014, 23:48 PM
#42
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Why the fuck Gren have difficulty winning 180MP CE squad?
l2p
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
21 Sep 2014, 00:03 AM
#43
Posts: 692
Why the fuck Gren have difficulty winning 180MP CE squad?
21 Sep 2014, 00:12 AM
#44
Posts: 4928
Id rather have penals be the throwaway infantry and conscripts be the base just for realism. Seems silly that a penal battalion becomes the "main" infantry of the USSR.
Penal Squad should be reworked into some sort of assault squadron. I don't want the changed into a long-range unit like others have suggested. Their current kit matches close-range identity more than long-range.
Penal Battalions were often used as Assault troops due to the high casualties that such units were expected to take. So the logic is that the Penals (armed with SVT's and satchels) are supposed to be 'suicide' units that attack the enemy defences head-on. In practice however the low suppression resistance and high-cost discourages such use.
I agree that they shoudn't be long-range units though, that doesn't fit the weapon they use.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
21 Sep 2014, 01:27 AM
#45
Posts: 2779
Nevermind, just find a new cheese of Soviet, not yet well known, you will know soon.
21 Sep 2014, 02:51 AM
#46
Posts: 647
Penal Battalions were often used as Assault troops due to the high casualties that such units were expected to take. So the logic is that the Penals (armed with SVT's and satchels) are supposed to be 'suicide' units that attack the enemy defences head-on. In practice however the low suppression resistance and high-cost discourages such use.
I agree that they shoudn't be long-range units though, that doesn't fit the weapon they use.
honestly, i dont care what they are called but they are in a perfect position for soviets as standard trained infantry. soviets has enough assault troops, conscripts/penals/shocks. what they really need are infantry that can take fire and dish out enough at range to deter infantry rushes.
the only one that fits are guards and guards being guards are currently doctrinal, too expensive and too squishy against all that incoming fire that german infantry are so capable of spewing.
21 Sep 2014, 02:55 AM
#47
Posts: 142
Nevermind, just find a new cheese of Soviet, not yet well known, you will know soon.
The infamous pio spam Soviet version, i guess?
21 Sep 2014, 07:28 AM
#48
Posts: 281
If cons are meant to be infinior they should cost less. it is just stupid that volks overal are better and cost less.
21 Sep 2014, 07:55 AM
#49
Posts: 4928
If cons are meant to be infinior they should cost less. it is just stupid that volks overal are better and cost less.
In what universe are Volks better than Cons? I'd take Cons over Volks easily.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
21 Sep 2014, 08:09 AM
#50
Posts: 281
In what universe are Volks better than Cons? I'd take Cons over Volks easily.
Way better in late and mid lease good in early.
vet 5, shreks, better nade, better vet bonnuses.
21 Sep 2014, 08:30 AM
#51
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Nevermind, just find a new cheese of Soviet, not yet well known, you will know soon.
Flamethrower upgrade is there since closed alpha and its not cheeze.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
21 Sep 2014, 08:30 AM
#52
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
In what universe are Volks better than Cons? I'd take Cons over Volks easily.
Deal.
When do we trade?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
21 Sep 2014, 08:52 AM
#53
Posts: 281
Cons take more damdge, lease good vet and no upragde at all.
21 Sep 2014, 08:52 AM
#54
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Deal.
When do we trade?
Volks feel like shittier anti infantry when compared to Cons. All they got for is the Schreck and ridiculous Vet 5 durability. Cons have more dps and way more utility.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
21 Sep 2014, 08:53 AM
#55
Posts: 647
In what universe are Volks better than Cons? I'd take Cons over Volks easily.
YES PLEASE. you can have all the cons in the world.
21 Sep 2014, 09:01 AM
#56
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Volks feel like shittier anti infantry when compared to Cons. All they got for is the Schreck and ridiculous Vet 5 durability. Cons have more dps and way more utility.
But then they get vet1 and onwards are better. I'd rather have less flexible squad that actually can do something then 'flexible' merge/cap bot.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
21 Sep 2014, 09:10 AM
#57
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Nevermind, just find a new cheese of Soviet, not yet well known, you will know soon.
I dunno about that, what I am sure of it is that new grens are completely crap.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
21 Sep 2014, 09:19 AM
#58
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
But then they get vet1 and onwards are better. I'd rather have less flexible squad that actually can do something then 'flexible' merge/cap bot.
Must be playing a different game.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
21 Sep 2014, 09:27 AM
#59
Posts: 239
I dunno about that, what I am sure of it is that new grens are completely crap.
21 Sep 2014, 09:27 AM
#60
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
I dunno about that, what I am sure of it is that new grens are completely crap.
this
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
168 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615220.737+9
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
806 users are online:
806 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49127
Welcome our newest member, Constant
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Constant
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM