So Sturmpioneers... what do?
Posts: 432
The patch notes showed that the close quarters or maximum damage range for Sturmpioneers has been adjusted to range-3 from the original range-8, while American Assault Engineers and Shocktroops were moved to a close range (read as max damage range) of range-10!
So what this tells us is that while any other SMG squad moves in to assault these former Assault Pioneers, they will have been in their max damage range 7 times over before closing in to facehugging range for 3 that the Sturmpioneers need to do effective enough damage to force them away.
This also means that if one so chose, they could have their SMG squads sitting back further and doing more damage than Sturmpioneers could! Because Max Damage at Range-10 > Max Damage at Range-3.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If you ask me, I guess Relic will change again the sturmpios. I mean they are quite broken now, and they don't serve their initial purpose. My intuition tells me that they will suffer contradictory changes in the future as pzgrenadiers did (Relic could not make up its mind related to them). I think that unfortunatelly sturmpios will suffer in the same way, and no reliable strategy can involve more than one squad. That it's sad
They have clearly explained the change on stream.
They will not change anything back.
L2P issue, they are mid range unit, not SMG CQC one, use them from cover at mid range.
Posts: 56
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
They have clearly explained the change on stream.
They will not change anything back.
L2P issue, they are mid range unit, not SMG CQC one, use them from cover at mid range.
Before, the best use was in cover, efficient from middle to close combat and still doing "some" damage from far distance, while being in cover all/most of the time.
L2P means now to learn using them as shock troopers - aka no brainer unit - closing them to hug distance in order to kill efficiently.
What I cand tell you about this is:
1 - STG 44 is not a SMG. It's an assault rifle. It's stupid to impose sturmpios to be used in this way.
2 - If Relic wanted them to be used in this way, they should have modified the values that grant them a more efficient defence. The received accuracy modifier it's not enough.
3 - They are an expensive unit. In addition, takes alot of time to reinforce. So, there is a verry big contradiction between their highest efficiency range and the way they should be used. I mean: before, because to reinfoce them was costly and took forever, they where used from mid distance alot and even from far distance in order to minimize losses. Loosing to quickly 1-2 models from squad was not the way to play them because of facts presented before. Now, while none of these facts changed (reinforcing time and cost), I am obliged - in order to have the old efficiency - to close to my opponents troops at face punching distance, loosing models at a higher rate. Suddenly, I can tell you frankly, they don't worth it.
The result: If you are playing without additional units like fallschirmjager or jager infantry, that means untill T4 you will have no efficient AI infantry which is verry bad agains early allied blobbing especially now when mg34 was toned down alot. That shouldn't be a problem for Ostheer, but OKW has the fuel problem and it cannot compensate through AI vehicles like sdkfz AA in the same manner as Ostheer. Any vehicle build, equals to donating an organ. Costly and with consequences in future (Bad consequences if you have bad luck losing it quickly or if you build the wrong vehicle).
That is the problem actualy. Sturmpios changes are contributing to overall okw infantry handicap increase which, in my view, is highly unrecommended given the resources situation.
Posts: 508
They kill conscripts pretty well in early game, and can beat rifles at some ranges 1v1, which isn't true of most OKW infantry. After that, they are very good at repair and can defend flanks or maybe do some flanking.
At least what I've seen them used for, haven't gotten a chance to play OKW this patch.
Posts: 432
Posts: 1042
Posts: 1439
Posts: 1130
Posts: 644
Posts: 1063
Posts: 196
Posts: 1439
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 332
Posts: 432
Relic already stated they want them to be a midrange combat unit, this "nerf" was to give them better utility at that range, and also a (Very small) survivability buff.
Problem with that idea there champ is that they do NOT do enough damage at midrange to deal with close combat troops or even rifle troops, they don't do enough damage period unless they are IN YOUR FREAKING FACE.
So yah, can't fill out that mid ranged role very well... they are mediocre at best.
Another glaring issue is that the Axis factions have just about zero strong close combat units as they are, which is sad because they pioneered the idea of mid to close range combat with their ingenious weapon designs from the MP-40 through to the STG-44, they were close quarters kings, and they outfitted many groups with rifles AND automatic weapons as force multipliers.
Posts: 292
They are a builder unit and that should be reflected in the price of the squad which it is now. They still dominate the first engagement you have in each game, only difference is that cover is more important. You can't just rush and win EVERY engagement with the opponents first unit anymore like you could before.
Comparing a starting unit with doctrinal Assault Engineers is just...
Posts: 38
And, if they're mid-range units now, they gon have a bad time facing BAR riflemen...
Livestreams
24 | |||||
11 | |||||
170 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1122623.643+3
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Alvino
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM