Soviet FHQ might need looked at.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2014, 19:59 PMOmega_Warrior

Why is no one mentioning the Leig. It might not kill a fhq as fast, but it will still get the job done. It will at very least draw them away from the building.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2014, 14:34 PMJadame!

Urban defence became beyond useless after introduction of walking stuka, which destroys 300 mp 60fu fhq (and probably all troops around it) no matter what in first barrage. In fact, this doctrine worse than nkvd now.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 02:25 AMMr. Someguy

Just like Tellermines and Reigel Mines are useless against USF because of critical repair.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 04:20 AMatouba

The FHQ should be built only on owned territory. It's ridiculous that the FHQ can be set up on neutral territory. If a FHQ is set up on territory very close to Axis bases at the very early game, what can Axis do then? Axis players can only fight left more territories being captured by Ally players safely. This will result in early lost to Axis. No territories no resources, no resources no wins. Big advantage for Allies. 8 min stuka? No, stuka will hit the field at about 13-15 min cuz OKW have no fuel due to less territories. And stuka have to face atleast 3 T34/76 in 4V4 game. The game will be over at 15 min.

Don't forget in some matchgame there is no Ost player which can provide motars. OKW's infantry support gun is a big big joke, they can kill 10 men during 40 mins game.

And, you guys mentioned the waste of 300 mp and 60 fuel, you hope 300 mp and 60 fuel unit works well during all the game?

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 10:08 AMGustavGans

-can be decapped

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 10:08 AMGustavGans

Easy fix;

-only buildable in owned territory
-requires (short)setup time
-can be decapped
-half its fuel cost

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 10:38 AMKatitof

If that would to go through, then fuel cost should be taken away completely.

Both axis factions have easily obtainable early hard counters to it, the doctrine offers NOTHING other.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 04:20 AMatouba

The FHQ should be built only on owned territory. It's ridiculous that the FHQ can be set up on neutral territory. If a FHQ is set up on territory very close to Axis bases at the very early game, what can Axis do then? Axis players can only fight left more territories being captured by Ally players safely. This will result in early lost to Axis. No territories no resources, no resources no wins. Big advantage for Allies. 8 min stuka? No, stuka will hit the field at about 13-15 min cuz OKW have no fuel due to less territories. And stuka have to face atleast 3 T34/76 in 4V4 game. The game will be over at 15 min.

...

Don't forget in some matchgame there is no Ost player which can provide motars. OKW's infantry support gun is a big big joke, they can kill 10 men during 40 mins game.
...

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 10:48 AMGustavGans

I wouldn't cross fuel cost out entirely, it would make it too spammable imo.

I guess "easily obtainable" is debatable. The MHT is doctrinal if you don't have it equipped or chose another commander already it's getting difficult. The stuka still costs alot of ressources and you'll delay other vehicles.
On the other hand you can see your enemy's loadout before the match begins, so you're not totally unprepared.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 16:45 PMludd3emm

It's funny that none of the Axis fanboys in this thread forgets that Urban Defense is very map dependent.

Try to play Allies for the first time in your life and try to use this commander on Hurtgen Forest, Crossing in the Woods, Minsk Pocket and other similar maps and proove to us how imba FHQ is.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 10:38 AMKatitof

If that would to go through, then fuel cost should be taken away completely.

Both axis factions have easily obtainable early hard counters to it, the doctrine offers NOTHING other.