Touche, and well explained.
You're welcome
Posts: 400
Posts: 306
"I'm most comfortable with OBW"
With what?
Sorry but sort of makes it look bad when you misname the faction, especially in this context
Posts: 692
People are just keep talking about 3v3 and 4v4. What is so great about these game modes anyway? Impossible to balance, not very tactical/technical eather.
Let me give you a quote from a top vCoh player (Sepha I guess?! I may be wrong...)
4v4 - it doesn't matter;
3v3 - it's at most entertaining;
2v2 - it's technical;
1v1 - it's glorious.
Posts: 824
Posts: 752
majority of players play 2v2+
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Its really not though, my friend WeWe plays a ton of soviets and never builds more than 1 sniper, and never spams maxims. In fact he gets really great use out of *gasp* penals. Its not easy to do, but to say that those are the only viable strats is just wrong and only furthers the idea that its the only option.
Posts: 665
Posts: 950 | Subs: 1
Id love to see some of his replays. Id like to learn his skillz.
Posts: 440
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
posted this in the conscript thread, but it seems more soviet players need to see this.
against top 100 okw
http://www.coh2.org/replay/22537/infantry-everywhere
and top 25
http://www.coh2.org/replay/22769/all-it-takes-is-just-one-sneaky-engineer...
now this isnt wewe, but redxwings wins without using snipers/maxims/shocks/guards/t34/85s/is2s/isu152s
playing like this certainly isnt easy to pull off, but i dont think that calls for buffing soviets. if you balance based on lower skill levels, there will be imbalances at high levels.
9 |