That is a pretty old video Jaigen. I might be wrong but I believe the maxim setup and/or turn time has been increased since then.
of course it is same goes for vids that elchino posted.
Posts: 1130
That is a pretty old video Jaigen. I might be wrong but I believe the maxim setup and/or turn time has been increased since then.
Posts: 752
That is a pretty old video Jaigen. I might be wrong but I believe the maxim setup and/or turn time has been increased since then.
Posts: 656
Posts: 1705
This made me curious enough to look it up. The video was made October 2013. Since then the maxim took two nerfs to rotation speed to address the issue.
December 10, 2013
Soviet Maxim: Rotation Speed Reduced from 225 degree/sec to 180 degree/sec
July 8, 2014
M1919 Maxim Heavy Machine Gun Team: Reduce Rotation Speed reduced from 180 degrees per second to 120 degrees per second
Anyway, enough derailment. I missed the point of Jaigen's video in the first place. Back to balance.
Posts: 665
Posts: 1705
Either the automatch is very kind to me, or I'm playing in an alternate reality, or my definition of ''widespread'' is not the same as yours. Since option 2 is probably out, and I otherwise face cheese strats from time to time (Volks blob, rifles blob, double sniper, Stug E spam, ect.), I'm gonna go with option 3 and say Maximspam is way more rare than some people try to make others believe. It's a bad strat used against bad players by bad players.
Posts: 971
In 1 vs 1 sure,above that very high density and relic recognizes it.They have the stats and know best.Maxim spam doesn't mean only maxims,but 3-5 maxims as primary unit and 1-2 cons as backup into shocks and zis usually.Instead of the hmg being the support weapon it acts as the main infantry unit..and with 6 members multiple maxims in buildings is just awful.Its used by majority of soviet players unless they are spamming snipers or in rare case m3.
Posts: 752
Cmon! 5 maxims?? And you can't win as Ostheer against a dude who did 5 maxims??
Have you ever heard about smoke?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So you are trying to argue only Doctrinals can respond to core units?
Interesting, if misguided, perspective tbh.
Posts: 752
Posts: 665
In 1 vs 1 sure,above that very high density and relic recognizes it.They have the stats and know best.Maxim spam doesn't mean only maxims,but 3-5 maxims as primary unit and 1-2 cons as backup into shocks and zis usually.Instead of the hmg being the support weapon it acts as the main infantry unit..and with 6 members multiple maxims in buildings is just awful.Its used by majority of soviet players unless they are spamming snipers or in rare case m3.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So how many Mortars then, with how much MP left for actual infantry into assault for effect through the smoke, while the Maxims just resetup fast for overlapping fields of fire?
How many Snipers?
*HF chasing Maxim with Snipers.
Since when do Sniper outrun Maxims btw?
Doesnt all Infantry have the same base movement speed?
Posts: 752
Posts: 971
So you are trying to argue only Doctrinals can respond to core units?
Interesting, if misguided, perspective tbh.
You are therefore suggesting that to counter a Maxim requires a Mortar+Smoke+Gren+LMG
Posts: 381
2 mortars or 2 snipers.
Nothing more is needed.
When you have LMGs you can a-move with grens, gunner will always be sniped.
Its no rocket science and its effective since the maxim spam exists.
Being stuck in denial about snipers or mortars and refusal to make them doesn't make them any less of a hardcounter.
Posts: 971
most people are arguing the maxim vs okw. dont know why you are going off about wehr counters. o wait, i know, you DONT want to talk about maxim vs okw, it will lead to the maxim needing nerfs.
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 752