Balance Changes

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 644

10 Jul 2014, 08:45 AMVindicareX

Grenadiers are pretty much useless [...]
- Buff Grens. They just suck so hard until they get vet 2/3 and get an LMG. Until then, they can barely hold their own vs Conscripts.

Posts: 644

10 Jul 2014, 09:03 AMLeepriest

I agree. Also grenadiers should start with duo LMG42, with 5 manpower to reinforce.

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Before this derails, i´m gonna save it.

-Theres no need for Grens to be buffed. Just nerf a bit the long range DPS of Riflemen.

-AA HT needs to be delayed and AT capabilities tone down.

AFTER THIS, i´m sure we can think of some ways to improve USA late game (besides fixing target priority)

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 747

11 Jul 2014, 05:48 AMelchino7

Before this derails, i´m gonna save it.

-Theres no need for Grens to be buffed. Just nerf a bit the long range DPS of Riflemen.

-AA HT needs to be delayed and AT capabilities tone down.

The Volks vs Rifles matchup would also profit from a long range dps decrease on Rifles.

The AA Halftrack is a known issue.

Another problem imo are weapon teams, the die incredibly fast to BAR/1919 or even Vanilla Rifles.

Ostheer vs USA really needs to be looked at.

Posts: 236

Having the flame upgrade for the HT return to T2 wouldnt be that bad of an idea, if you think long and hard about it. The balance has changed quite a bit since that nerf went into effect. The only thing though is perhaps lack of soviet AT early game that is non-doctrinal? Americans can get AT quite quickly and I have seen soviets pull out an AT gun quickly too.

When a nerf/buff occurs for a unit/faction it should never be viewed as final/permanent, because every change to the game ultimately can effect everything including old unit nerfs/buffs.

Posts: 1637

11 Jul 2014, 03:41 AMraw

Thats Obers not Dual LMG grens

5 Mar 2015, 21:57 PMREforever

The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.

Multi Quote

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

11 Jul 2014, 18:28 PM__deleted__

Having the flame upgrade for the HT return to T2 wouldnt be that bad of an idea, if you think long and hard about it. The balance has changed quite a bit since that nerf went into effect. The only thing though is perhaps lack of soviet AT early game that is non-doctrinal? Americans can get AT quite quickly and I have seen soviets pull out an AT gun quickly too.

When a nerf/buff occurs for a unit/faction it should never be viewed as final/permanent, because every change to the game ultimately can effect everything including old unit nerfs/buffs.

FHT could be brought a bit faster but not as fast as T2. Reduce a bit fuel cost for BP2 and increase it for T3.
This would have a double effect of making a bit more accesible T4 while making FHT a bit more reliable.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1637

11 Jul 2014, 19:34 PMelchino7

FHT could be brought a bit faster but not as fast as T2. Reduce a bit fuel cost for BP2 and increase it for T3.
This would have a double effect of making a bit more accesible T4 while making FHT a bit more reliable.

My name is JHeartless and I support this message..

5 Mar 2015, 21:57 PMREforever

The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.

Multi Quote