Posts: 1617
Posts: 1130
Thank you for confirming yet again that last time you've seen soviets up close was during intro.
KV-1 at its current stats can deal only with P4 and even that is fully RNG based. Or in other words, P4 have MORE chance to win against KV-1 frontally, then T34/76 have to win against P4.
KV-1 is a slow, not at all durable(nerfed HP by a HUGE amount, KV-1 have less hp them T34/85, increased AT on everything) tank with a gun that belongs to flanking vehicle, yet its unable to flank anything.
In its current state, KV-1 is reliable only against an Ostwind and nothing more, while T34/76 is a game against all tanks due to its speed, so think again before calling it superior.
Now, when it comes to all other call-ins that actually ARE effective, instead of increasing their CP, which will change nothing, increase their fuel price so they can't be spammed as easily and loosing one can actually be felt instead pumping one tiger after another.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Amazing how you can be wrong on so many issues with so few words.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1162
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Kv1 is good for trolling grens seen as faust often bounces off the front.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1702
Posts: 1637
T-34/76 is superior to the KV-1. And that actually makes sense. The reason why USSR stopped making KV-1s is because a KV-1 was more expensive and t-34/76 did everything that the kv-1 could do for cheaper.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 126
Posts: 1637
I often use the kv1. It is not a super heavy call in. It is best used after you go tier 4 su85 . Use the kv1 to soak damage get line of sight on enemy armor. Use the su85 just behind the kv1. You also have the b4 to make up for the lack of damage output as well.
The only thing I hate about the kv1 is the super long repair times. You need about 4 engie squads to get it back online in decent time.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1063
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
KV1 and KV8 are the about the only tanks that can, well, tank.
Everything else is too expensive or too fragile
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1130
Given how almost everything have well over 50% to pen KV-1 and how it have less HP then T34/85?
I'd question your statement.
While its fine for KV-8, KV-1 is a paper with a pea shooter.
Slow, squishy tank with a gun made for flanking.
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
and 50% more armor then the t-34-85. Alos the t-34-85 is a bit to cost effective at the moment.
Posts: 1130
KV-1 is just plain bad right now. The only thing it kinda does good against is PIV, anything else you'd actually be BETTER off with a T34/76.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Compared to the t-34-85 it indeed is bad. The t-34 still has a decent change of losing to the p4. the kv1 will flat out steam roll it unless the p4 gets really lucky.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1637
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 1130
No one compares it to 34/85.
Its bad compared to 34/76.
Cruzz said it there in its post and you still try some strawman argument.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1130
Oh, nice, another attempt at discrediting me.
You've proven here that your posts bear no value and arguments hold no weight as they are completely detached from reality, so you're trying to take someone with you on your sinking ship?
I'm saying 'sinking ship' like that would mean you had any creditability before.
Spoiler alert.
You can't even make a good argument why KV-1 would be better then T34/76 and get a single person to back you up with it.
Why do you even try other then arguing for the sake of arguing?
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
280 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
