Posts: 37
Call-ins are a tough call, maybe increasing their CPS might help. This could help encourage more use of the tech tree.
Pushing back the CP's isn't a good change imo.
Because a T34/85 on it's own won't have a great impact at 10 or 11 CP.
Teching to unlock it, that's something I like more.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2053
Why do people want this?
Limiting top Tier Call Ins to one per side I can sort of see because that is allegedly the way in worked in COH1 and an army that consists of 3 Tigers is kinda silly
Still don't think it is a good idea though.
However making Call In tanks need tech I don't see the reasoning?
Posts: 1130
However making Call In tanks need tech I don't see the reasoning?
Posts: 807
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Because its killing the game. The only real doctrines that matter have all call in tanks. otherwise you putting yourself at a rather major disadvantage as your opponent can simply forgo tech and have far more fuel available for his tanks then you have for your non call in tanks.
This especially true for the kv1 t-34/85 and sherman which can easily replace the entire tier 3.
So any doctrine that doesnt have call in tanks are put at disadvantage and i really want to level the playing field between doctrines. this makes the game more fun as other doctrines and strategy's become available.
Posts: 2819
I hate the idea of limiting the number of heavy tanks. You end up with useless fuel, and vCoH Heavies used no fuel. If the enemy ends up with several heavies, then that is YOUR undoing.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1063
That only applies to the soviets t-34-76/85 .
Posts: 875 | Subs: 6
Posts: 231
Posts: 2053
A lot of games, the tiger rolls out and soviets are forced to retreat
you played a bad game.
Posts: 1130
Having teching required for call-in is not a good idea IMO. The reason that call-ins cost extra fuel is because they do not require teching. If I have to tech to t4 to get a Tiger, why not just get a Panther instead for cheaper? It doesn't make sense.
Or even worse, why get a KV1 if I have a T3 building up anyway? T34s perform better in almost every way, for cheaper. The whole reason the KV1 has any value is because you can get it without investing in tech.
Posts: 2053
1 
Posts: 44 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1162
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
They cost extra fuel because they are superior units. This also goes for the kv1 which basically is more durable t-34
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2819
Um... where are the soviet tanks and AT guns?
So you lose either way. If you werent able to deal with one Tiger, then two Tigers are there to further prove your failure. And if they had control of the fuel/large amounts of the map, then yes, it was a bad game and you have already lost.
 |
|
|
43 | ||
|
|
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
5 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
