Login

russian armor

StugE needs a slight tone down

30 May 2014, 04:24 AM
#1
avatar of ilGetUSomDay

Posts: 612

I think for the cheapness the Stug E needs a slight tone down (not the previous useless ness). With the new explosives the Stug E just racks up kills easily and is rather accurate. I do not know of the explosives will be really looked at in the next patch, if so then that should do. But if not I think that a slight accuracy adjustment should be fine.
30 May 2014, 04:33 AM
#2
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Anything less and it is useless once more. Any AT easily kills it, and it is super handicapped with a broken engine. Its a stug with even less AT and costs only a tad cheaper. Its fine, unless you want people arguing about the effectiveness of soviet AI tanks...
30 May 2014, 04:35 AM
#3
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

30 May 2014, 05:38 AM
#4
avatar of kosmique

Posts: 28

u guys just arent to be satisfied ... how about YOU adjust YOUR gameplay ?
30 May 2014, 05:45 AM
#5
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130

I think for the cheapness the Stug E needs a slight tone down (not the previous useless ness). With the new explosives the Stug E just racks up kills easily and is rather accurate. I do not know of the explosives will be really looked at in the next patch, if so then that should do. But if not I think that a slight accuracy adjustment should be fine.


works just fine compared to the other AI tanks. no change is currently needed
30 May 2014, 06:39 AM
#6
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

I do get the impression that it is a bit too effective at the moment, but it could be that Relic's idea behind this unit is to be on pair with KV-8 regarding AI capabilities. That said small adjustment won't hurt.
30 May 2014, 07:18 AM
#7
avatar of Kreatiir

Posts: 2819

It is very effective when you put 6 shocks before a StugE.
But dude, you see the assgrens very early in the game, so you know the stugE is coming at 6 CP. Get a freakin' Zis out and the StugE can't do shit. StugE hasn't got big armor.

Yes it's good against infantry, but not too good.
Just get some support.
30 May 2014, 08:23 AM
#8
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

It's fine as is.
30 May 2014, 09:08 AM
#9
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

No, it doesn't need to be nerfed even slightly. It has 400 hit points so 1 at grenade and 2 zis shots or 2 guard squads with button or mark and its down. Plus people dont usually spam it like the Stug G because its pretty useless against tanks.
30 May 2014, 10:25 AM
#10
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

the stug E does not need a tone down in anti-inf.

What it needs is a tone down in anti tank capabilities.

Even tho it has low penetration for some reason it does 160 damage, which means that it needs only 4 penetrating shots to kill off a t-34/76.

That's a bit weird since PIV command tank does like 80? or even less damage...

so yeah, STUG e needs a damage nerf when it comes to armor, it should do a full 160 damage againts tanks... it should basically be a non turreted command tank when it comes to anti armor. I honestly think that this could of been a bug or something.
30 May 2014, 10:29 AM
#11
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Umm, StuG-e does 80 damage.
Pretty much always did. With 40 penetration.
30 May 2014, 10:32 AM
#12
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

jump backJump back to quoted post30 May 2014, 10:29 AMKatitof
Umm, StuG-e does 80 damage.
Pretty much always did. With 40 penetration.



hmm, that's weird, i remember aproaching 2 stug-e assault guns with my t-34 and both of the shots penetrated (not very often it does that but still) and the t-34/76 went down from full to half health. Must of missed a pak somewhere there.


Oh, its fine then really.
30 May 2014, 10:50 AM
#13
avatar of GustavGans

Posts: 747

Stug-E is fine the way it is.
30 May 2014, 11:39 AM
#14
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

I have the same problem with the StugE as I do with other call-ins. They should require some sort of tech in addition to the CPs.

30 May 2014, 11:45 AM
#15
avatar of crash

Posts: 52

I think for the cheapness the Stug E needs a slight tone down (not the previous useless ness). With the new explosives the Stug E just racks up kills easily and is rather accurate. I do not know of the explosives will be really looked at in the next patch, if so then that should do. But if not I think that a slight accuracy adjustment should be fine.


i bet you feel like this guy now

30 May 2014, 12:14 PM
#16
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

^xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
30 May 2014, 13:25 PM
#17
avatar of ilGetUSomDay

Posts: 612

Ok, I only thought if anything it only needed a slight adjustment but it seems I was wrong, I have just had extreme luck when using it and when facing it where it just always hits and kills 2-3 guys every shot. For 200 MP and 75 fuel it just seemed too effective for its cost but I guess not
30 May 2014, 14:47 PM
#18
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

Ok, I only thought if anything it only needed a slight adjustment but it seems I was wrong, I have just had extreme luck when using it and when facing it where it just always hits and kills 2-3 guys every shot. For 200 MP and 75 fuel it just seemed too effective for its cost but I guess not


Remember, it's an anti infantry unit that comes late at cp6.
30 May 2014, 19:19 PM
#19
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

It´s fine. Next.
5 Jun 2014, 10:43 AM
#20
avatar of thestrongone

Posts: 69

Permanently Banned
if anything that needs a tonedown its the screaming ability of soviet fanboy posters
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

839 users are online: 839 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM