Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv

Jump back to quoted post9 May 2014, 23:35 PMVonMecha

DEATH MATCH!!!!!!!!

Jump back to quoted post9 May 2014, 23:46 PMFlyingsmonster

You spend more time posting on here than actually playing the game. In fact you have over 7x the amount of posts here as games played.

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 03:38 AMcoh2player

Just a theory: It looks like Katip 'studies' hard by using the forums, and then uses his knowledge to perhaps test a few strats with AI, and then plays a real game. Meticulous.. that is why his win/lose ratio is so high.

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 04:04 AMGreenDevil

My bad, I feel terrible. I actually thought Katitof was Nullist, just new account?

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 09:20 AMKatitof

For this insult, I will not stand still.

Show Spoiler

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 04:04 AMGreenDevil

My bad, I feel terrible. I actually thought Katitof was Nullist, just new account?

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 13:02 PMdasheepeh

Katitof may lack in social skills, but his posts are usually spot on. Even if he didnt play much, he is still able to argue better than 85% of you. And in most cases, he is absolutely right.

When i see people like lolcake who accuse him of just spitting bullshit without any facts i just cant do anything else but laugh.

Its getting pathetic here.

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 15:40 PMThoseDeafMutes

It wouldn't matter if he was 100% right 100% of the time, he's still violating site policy vis a vis "being respectful to other members". This is a policy that seems extremely loosely enforced, unfortunately. At any rate, take a casual stroll through his post history here and on the official forums. You'll see a pretty clear trend, which is that he's only interested in fixing balance issues that are hurting the Soviet faction. He generally takes the "L2PlayNub" stance on balance problems hurting the Germans. And he's quite frequently an asshole to people while doing it.

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 11:56 AMMarcoRossolini

I've just had a couple of 2v2s as Germans, you dedicated German players have no clue how good you have it.

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 18:56 PMKronosaur0s

Can someone explain me who the heck is Nullist and what he did and what he is famous for?

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 19:32 PMMoerserKarL

he's a troll legend!

http://www.coh2.org/user/5732/nullist

Jump back to quoted post9 May 2014, 23:46 PMFlyingsmonster

There's only two glaringly obvious things I see need changing in this game. I'm sure there are more smaller issues at hand, but these are the largest that need to be addressed by Relic sooner rather than later.

1) ISU-152 needs to be reversed to its previous state. I used it a lot back when no one used it, and thought it was just fine. It still wiped infantry squads occasionally, and it could damage most axis tanks, even the elefant, though it didn't penetrate every shot 100% like it does now. This needs to be fixed. It's scatter should be nerfed to how it was before. Overall, it's just a gamebreaking unit presently. At vet II, it has a 6 second reload! 6 seconds! That needs to be adjusted asap.

2) Soviet TM-35 mine - It should not be squadwiping fresh, brand new panzergrens / grenadiers. This is simply unacceptable as a tradeoff - 30 munitions to kill an entire squad? Its AI needs to be nerfed into oblivion, with perhaps a slight munitions increase to 35 or so. The advantage should be that they are cheaper than other AT mines, but have the disadvantage of being set off by infantry. They should remain an AV mine first, and have a very small AI capacity.

Also, on a side note - this Katitof guy needs to stop shitposting in every thread he enters. You have a right to your opinions, but every single thread I see this guy post in devolves into back and forth nonsense, "L2P" "1v1 me u bitch" type antics, etc. There's also the fact that someone that has barely played 150 matches total (he's not even rank 100 yet, almost a year after release?) is dictating that their view of the game superior to people who have thousands of matches played.

You spend more time posting on here than actually playing the game. In fact you have over 7x the amount of posts here as games played.

Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 19:45 PMWhySooSerious

The 100% penetration you encountered is most likely "just your luck (RNG)" because I've never seen the new ISU penetrate the elefant consistently without dying first. I've used the ISU vs elefant and does not penetrate the elefant on every shot. Deflects first shot and penetrates second shot, and pray it will keep penetrating or else the isu will die to elefant. When I encounter ISU it's pretty simple get and elefant. Most people would want to use elefant with tigers but I like using the Tiger Ace with the elefant and I find it to be more effective than multiple tigers in its feeling of ease of micro and its accuracy is legendary, it wipes squads on retreat as if they weren't retreating at all. I do agree that the ISU needs a nerf on its AI capabilities. I repeat again if the ISU's every shot penetrated your elefant then it is likely your luck. You didn't sacrifice enough goats to the RNG God MVGame.