Soviet Reserve Commander problem

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 2561

There is a small problem with the irregular call-ins. They don't gain the effects of rapid conscription. If this was intended it doesn't quite make sense. Why penalize a player for using one ability by constricting the use of another. At the moment it's really messing with the flow of this commander. Is this simply an oversight since they were built off the pre-multiplayer partisans?

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

They never did. Same with merging.

Say thanks to relic for making a doctrine that is inconsistent within itself.

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote

Posts: 2779

3 Mar 2014, 11:08 AMKatitof

They never did. Same with merging.

Say thanks to relic for making a doctrine that is inconsistent within itself.

Why choose this while Partisan is much better as a trolling doctrine?

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2014, 12:35 PMPorygon

Why choose this while Partisan is much better as a trolling doctrine?

PPSH

Posts: 2779

3 Mar 2014, 12:36 PMdasheepeh

PPSH

Choose the maphack one if you want PPSH

Posts: 2561

3 Mar 2014, 12:35 PMPorygon

Why choose this while Partisan is much better as a trolling doctrine?

It's pretty good doctrine. It has a totally different purpose then partisans. This is more of strong general infantry type of doctrine. Irregulars are pretty good with their grenades and LMGs. They are a good alternative to cons that give up durability for firepower. Except it's ruined since if you field a lot of them you don't get as much from rapid conscription.

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2014, 12:45 PMPorygon

Choose the maphack one if you want PPSH

Choose Partisans doc if you want Maphack.

Posts: 2561

What the hell guys. This was a simple issue that they should change. Saying "Just use another doctrine" is kind of annoying.

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2014, 13:27 PMOmega_Warrior

What the hell guys. This was a simple issue that they should change. Saying "Just use another doctrine" is kind of annoying.

I know, but i just had to counter it D:

Posts: 3293

please try to stay on topic you can discuss other matters in other threads, of which there are plenty.

Failure is always an option.

It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)

Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences.

To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage!

and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!

Multi Quote

Posts: 1637

Agreed. It makes Merge and Rapid Conscription even less valuable. Please fix.

5 Mar 2015, 21:57 PMREforever

The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41

You can actually merge with irregulars these days, they fixed that at some point after they first released them.

But yeah, it's kinda stupid that they don't work with rapid conscription.