Soviet Reserve Commander problem

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 2561

There is a small problem with the irregular call-ins. They don't gain the effects of rapid conscription. If this was intended it doesn't quite make sense. Why penalize a player for using one ability by constricting the use of another. At the moment it's really messing with the flow of this commander. Is this simply an oversight since they were built off the pre-multiplayer partisans?

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

They never did. Same with merging.

Say thanks to relic for making a doctrine that is inconsistent within itself.

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote

Posts: 2779

3 Mar 2014, 11:08 AMKatitof

They never did. Same with merging.

Say thanks to relic for making a doctrine that is inconsistent within itself.

Why choose this while Partisan is much better as a trolling doctrine?

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2014, 12:35 PMPorygon

Why choose this while Partisan is much better as a trolling doctrine?

PPSH

Posts: 2779

3 Mar 2014, 12:36 PMdasheepeh

PPSH

Choose the maphack one if you want PPSH

Posts: 2561

3 Mar 2014, 12:35 PMPorygon

Why choose this while Partisan is much better as a trolling doctrine?

It's pretty good doctrine. It has a totally different purpose then partisans. This is more of strong general infantry type of doctrine. Irregulars are pretty good with their grenades and LMGs. They are a good alternative to cons that give up durability for firepower. Except it's ruined since if you field a lot of them you don't get as much from rapid conscription.

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2014, 12:45 PMPorygon

Choose the maphack one if you want PPSH

Choose Partisans doc if you want Maphack.

Posts: 2561

What the hell guys. This was a simple issue that they should change. Saying "Just use another doctrine" is kind of annoying.

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2014, 13:27 PMOmega_Warrior

What the hell guys. This was a simple issue that they should change. Saying "Just use another doctrine" is kind of annoying.

I know, but i just had to counter it D:

Posts: 3293

please try to stay on topic you can discuss other matters in other threads, of which there are plenty.

Failure is always an option.

It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)

Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences.

To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage!

and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!

Multi Quote

Posts: 1637

Agreed. It makes Merge and Rapid Conscription even less valuable. Please fix.

5 Mar 2015, 21:57 PMREforever

The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41

You can actually merge with irregulars these days, they fixed that at some point after they first released them.

But yeah, it's kinda stupid that they don't work with rapid conscription.

New topic

New Reply

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Subscribe to thread

SHOUT IT OUT!

SupremeStefan: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3457737797
Last Friday, 12:42 PM

Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM

Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus

Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM

dasheepeh: it was an honor guys

Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM

aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st"

Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM

Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead

Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM

dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM

Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM

Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM

Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM

Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM

Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM

Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM

Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy

27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM

Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM

Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific.

.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM

Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM

Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM

Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM

Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Livestreams

Ladders Top 10