Currently range does not affect weapon penetration as it does accuracy, which I find curious considering the capabilities of the engine, the significance of range in historical tank warfare and the overall game design, which for infantry allows for combat to be paced differently (fast at close range, slow at long).
Currently you're either in or out (of range) and shoot outs last roughly the same time at pointblank or maximum range. I think this is something that could be tuned to add a lot more depth to tank warfare (think closing distance with t34's, using tank traps to control range, long distance engagements resulting in stalemate, etc).
Penetration as a function of Range
24 Feb 2014, 22:08 PM
#1
Posts: 60
24 Feb 2014, 22:13 PM
#2
5 
Posts: 3421 | Subs: 11
First user created poll ever!
Yes, for me it makes more sense to have a better chance of penetrating at closer ranges. That's how it pretty much went with AT weapons. You had to be really close to deal actual damage.
Yes, for me it makes more sense to have a better chance of penetrating at closer ranges. That's how it pretty much went with AT weapons. You had to be really close to deal actual damage.
24 Feb 2014, 23:34 PM
#3
Posts: 1701
Elefant will be useless 
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
25 Feb 2014, 00:53 AM
#4
Posts: 208
Yes it should (like in vCoH)
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us"
http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197961759507
http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197961759507
25 Feb 2014, 01:08 AM
#5
Posts: 39
Elefant will be useless
Obviously the elephant would still penetrate very reliably at max range =P
This change would be messy though. With some really rough balance for a while. Maybe they will do it for an expansion.
25 Feb 2014, 01:16 AM
#6
Posts: 170
Yes this change would be great!
25 Feb 2014, 01:39 AM
#7
Posts: 166
Permanently BannedAccuracy is a function of range and the dice roll is very similar to penetration dice rolls. Having both is redundant.
Only Relic post
25 Feb 2014, 16:58 PM
#8
Posts: 267 | Subs: 8
Accuracy is a function of range and the dice roll is very similar to penetration dice rolls. Having both is redundant.
Not if we wanted to better define a units functionality; i.e. a vehicle having a relatively high close range penetration but a steep drop off at long range.
25 Feb 2014, 17:23 PM
#9
Posts: 157
Perhaps having the stug III e and command tank have better chances to pen at close range vs t-34s and t-34/76s better able to pen pIVs at close range?
25 Feb 2014, 18:01 PM
#10
15 
Posts: 786
doesn't make sense to me, Razh already has a point on it, plus longer range = more chance to miss because of scatter.
mobility already defines units roles, turreted tanks are close/mid range, non turreted are long range, paks are mid/long range
mobility already defines units roles, turreted tanks are close/mid range, non turreted are long range, paks are mid/long range
25 Feb 2014, 18:16 PM
#11
Posts: 157
People always complaining about depth... wouldn't something like this add depth?
25 Feb 2014, 18:32 PM
#12
Posts: 308 | Subs: 1
People are voting against this?
#CoH2
#CoH2
25 Feb 2014, 18:52 PM
#13
Posts: 317
People are voting against this?
#CoH2
A 1000 times this!
25 Feb 2014, 18:57 PM
#14
Posts: 542
Don't know, I would usually be strongly in favor of it, but the way units work in this game with very unrealistic range values in comparison to real life units in the first place I am not sure.
25 Feb 2014, 19:32 PM
#15
Posts: 258
I think all tanks need minimum range, something like 3-4m, and all AT weapons - increased penetration for every shot from close range(under 15m).
25 Feb 2014, 21:24 PM
#16
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
This would just bring a truck load of new balance problems for very little potential gain in the quality of game-play.
25 Feb 2014, 21:26 PM
#17
Posts: 166
Permanently Banned
Not if we wanted to better define a units functionality; i.e. a vehicle having a relatively high close range penetration but a steep drop off at long range.
So why not give it high accuracy at close range and steep drop off accuracy at long range?
25 Feb 2014, 21:28 PM
#18
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
So why not give it high accuracy and close range and steep drop off accuracy at long range?
That would just make too much sense. Away with you!
25 Feb 2014, 22:35 PM
#19
Posts: 4928
Accuracy is a function of range and the dice roll is very similar to penetration dice rolls. Having both is redundant.
Have you looked at how the weapons are programmed?
Ready aim time
Fire aim time
Post firing aim time
Post firing cooldown
Cooldown
Windup
Winddown
What does all this translate too? The time between shooting one bullet and shooting the next.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
25 Feb 2014, 23:15 PM
#20
Posts: 63
I like this idea, but I agree it should be different for each vehicle. Long range tank destroyers should be less affected. Maybe even increase the penetration for some vehicles up close from their current values(t34/76, su76, PzIV command tank, etc).
I'd be interested to see how it would be implemented, percent values or penetration ranges maybe?
I'd be interested to see how it would be implemented, percent values or penetration ranges maybe?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
102 | ||
 |
|
|
34 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
161 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1122623.643+3
- 10.265138.658+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
10
Download
1245
Board Info
1010 users are online:
1010 guests
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49427
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM