Finally some balance, what to do now?
Posts: 680
Sorry if I offended anyone (on a loosingstreak)by stating the game is balanced.
Posts: 3548 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4928
I'd also like to see Ostheer get better grenades, the inverse of the above, Ostheer Grenades are overpriced for their effect. Assault Grenadiers are the worst perpetrator, they pay 45 mun for multiple grenades, which rarely kill more than 2 people maximum. Last night I had an engagement where my Shock Grenade killed 2 men far apart from each other, then his Rifle Grenade killed one Shock, then his Bundle Grenade killed one more. Oh those wacky communist Terminators.
Lastly, Molotovs should probably be disabled during suppression. It's a bit silly that you can still Oorah into an MG 42 and have a chance at winning anyway if you have more than one Conscript doing it. As Soviets, I rarely bother to do a full flank, because I can just do a partial flank and then Ooralotov.
Posts: 125
anyway i do agree that your freedom is limitid so i would say cut moli rang in a X amount of % like 60% or sumting around that line
i dont feel ppsh is a big problem. i use it alot and if you want al cons to have it, its harder cuz it realy is heavy on the muni for al your cons to use molis and at naed al the time. you just cant do it anymore. also yes it can be effectivly counterd with g43
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Germans will still whine that something from soviet arsenal killed their ubermensh and space technology tanks, soviets will still whine that T34 can't take on anything and 2 dedicated AT units is not enough.
Rinse and repeat for the games lifspan with new DLCs in between.
Posts: 324 | Subs: 2
More serious suggestions:
-re-enable goddamn mod support (i want my historical accurate skins back and be able to zoom the camera further out)
-lessen RNG impact (mines, faust, at nade, ram, support weapons getting chain-decrewed on retreat etc.)
-improve vehicle pathfinding (if possible at all)
-iron out wonky game mechanics (for instance units have no LOS if standing close IN FRONT of bushes, infantry take a stop on retreat and run back into cover - annoying things like that.)
In short: make the game more pleasant to play, more consistent, more skillful.
And yes, new commanders with unique units that are balanced is alright with me.
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3709 | Subs: 2
Then/at the same time, they need to create more strategic options and ways for better and worse players to differentiate themselves.
Posts: 247
And they should add lobbies. The absence of this simple feature simply made the game worthless to a lot of people.
Posts: 1003
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
penals, scout cars, mid game
he main issue right now is the business model, how they can fix the mistakes done (pay 2 win), and move forward with a model that allows them to make money to keep supporting the game, while at the same time not being frowned upon by either casual or competitive player base.
just a suggestion:
free to play MP automatch
paid single player campaign, ToW, skin DLCs, custom game MP.
Posts: 1679 | Subs: 5
The only way you can improve as a strategic player is to figure out the best possible combination of units that allows you to react to the widest range of opposing unit compositions. It's so uninteresting.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Give players more options to spend their resources on that aren't just more units. I played a bunch of games over the weekend and I can't express enough how incredibly dull it is that the only strategic decisions you have to make are "Build this unit? Or build that unit?"
The only way you can improve as a strategic player is to figure out the best possible combination of units that allows you to react to the widest range of opposing unit compositions. It's so uninteresting.
Well, that would require serious overhaul of basically everything.
I can see that for the possible future armies, but definitely not for current ones, unless they come up with "global upgrades commander".
Posts: 184
-The Stug is almost entirely useless
-Ram should just stun a crew, especially when its against Tigers
-Squad wipes for Ostheer are too much, if it can't be fixed then reduce the manpower cost for squads.
- German Doctrines are almost all 'meh' whereas the soviets have a far better selection to choose from.
The fundamental design problem with the germans is there is very little tactical flexibility, the soviets can come at the game in so many different ways.
Posts: 410
Posts: 101
Balance is not the core issue, Relic is usually good at fix that. The main issue right now is the business model, how they can fix the mistakes done (pay 2 win), and move forward with a model that allows them to make money to keep supporting the game, while at the same time not being frowned upon by either casual or competitive player base.
A COH2 'season pass' that gives access to all the DLC for a discounted price would have been a good idea.
Posts: 134
Nothing will change.
Germans will still whine that something from soviet arsenal killed their ubermensh and space technology tanks, soviets will still whine that T34 can't take on anything and 2 dedicated AT units is not enough.
Rinse and repeat for the games lifspan with new DLCs in between.
+1
This hits the nail on the head!
Posts: 108
i don't have number buf if Relic money come from 90% commanders sales and 10% everything else, even if everybody says it is not good for the game, i don't think they can/want/will change anything.
And there is a lot of random particulary for grenades and sometimes it's too much ! But it's part of the game no? Go play SC2 if you want no random
Posts: 449
Here are some thoughts:
-top voted player maps could be grouped into purchasable (but easily affordable) map packs and available to automatch in a separate category. Sort of like CS:GO's operations. Eventually some could be added to regular automatch.
-create loads of tank / infantry skins and make them trade-able items that sometimes drop after a game. Allow people to create and sell their own skins. This could provide some goal to the useless xp model currently implemented. For example, an item might drop every time a new level is reached.
-bulletins could become tradeable items as well and drop in the same way as skins.
Posts: 1679 | Subs: 5
The problem with selling maps is the CoH2 community is just too small. People won't buy maps unless they're reasonable certain that they will be able to play on them. When there's barely enough people automatching to find a game in a timely manner, maps that segment the community aren't going to be successful.
Honestly, I think if Relic had gone the cosmetics approach to DLC right off the bat, everyone would be a lot happier. Make interesting skins, give units custom animations or voice lines for certain skins, sell customized faceplates and base buildings so players can pimp their clans, let people sell custom HUDs. Hell, I'd buy a custom HUD if it fixed the terrible default CoH2 HUD, and I'd buy some cool-looking skins if they were worth the money and came with some cool extras. No way in hell will I buy a commander though. Not going to support a business model that's fucking a game that already has enough problems of its own.
Livestreams
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.943411.696-1
- 4.715.934+12
- 5.35659.858+2
- 6.599234.719+7
- 7.278108.720+29
- 8.307114.729+3
- 9.269143.653+2
- 10.10629.785+7
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
9 posts in the last week
32 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, apollo-hvac
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM