i know that the tiger ace is OP, but spam's is OP too...
Yeah! I demand a nerf for spam in the next patch!!!
It makes too much damage!!
And moves so fast!!!
SNF Tiger Ace news
1 Feb 2014, 14:17 PM
#101
Posts: 971
Yeah! I demand a nerf for spam in the next patch!!!
It makes too much damage!!
And moves so fast!!!
1 Feb 2014, 14:26 PM
#102
Posts: 680
Changing the TA is gonna chamge the meta. In 2v2 at my (noob)level there isnt a single game that there isnt at least one TA. Sometimes theres dual TA.
1 Feb 2014, 14:33 PM
#103
Posts: 503
Permanently Banned
Yeah! I demand a nerf for spam in the next patch!!!
It makes too much damage!!
And moves so fast!!!
You quote only the part that you like?
Spam artillery? Spam infantry? Like a crazy?
And some soviet's player's spam into your base (cut off points) in early game, like 3/4 conscripts, they dont get the territory, they come to you, the early soviet spam is OP...
And spam artillery is a freak!
Soo, if i resist, call tiger ace in late game (very late! tier 16!)... No more...
That as balance, early, middle game, sov crazy spam's, late game german response! Right?
1 Feb 2014, 14:48 PM
#104
Posts: 971
You quote only the part that you like?
Spam artillery? Spam infantry? Like a crazy?
And some soviet's player's spam into your base (cut off points) in early game, like 3/4 conscripts, they dont get the territory, they come to you, the early soviet spam is OP...
And spam artillery is a freak!
Soo, if i resist, call tiger ace in late game (very late! tier 16!)... No more...
That as balance, early, middle game, sov crazy spam's, late game german response! Right?
Sorry dude, but it's hard for me to believe that someone can actually have trouble dealing with soviet artillery.
Just change your stupid Elite Troop commander for some other more capable to destroy enemy arty. And against con spam, just build mgs.
1 Feb 2014, 16:47 PM
#105
Posts: 1617
The Tiger Ace deserves the nerf, but only if they nerf the damn il-2 skillplaneultrarape too.ű
Im tired of losing retreating squads to it.
Same with the TA, boring and annoying to play against it.
Both doesnt require any serious skill or micro
Im tired of losing retreating squads to it.
Same with the TA, boring and annoying to play against it.
Both doesnt require any serious skill or micro
1 Feb 2014, 17:05 PM
#106
Posts: 2561
The Tiger Ace deserves the nerf, but only if they nerf the damn il-2 skillplaneultrarape too.ű
Im tired of losing retreating squads to it.
Same with the TA, boring and annoying to play against it.
Both doesnt require any serious skill or micro
This isn't a negotiation. The strafe may be OP, but it's problem lies in the behavior that plagues all strafe call-ins, which is much more complex then simple stat and cost changes. I would be surprized if we saw that changed this patch.
1 Feb 2014, 17:10 PM
#107
Posts: 1617
This isn't a negotiation. The strafe may be OP, but it's problem lies in the behavior that plagues all strafe call-ins, which is much more complex then simple stat and cost changes. I would be surprized if we saw that changed this patch.
I now it's not a negotiation. It should be like the strafe/bombing run in vCOH, where WE HAD TO select the target area. It was a good and well working thing, i dunno why they took it out.
1 Feb 2014, 17:19 PM
#108
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Sorry dude, but it's hard for me to believe that someone can actually have trouble dealing with soviet artillery.
Just change your stupid Elite Troop commander for some other more capable to destroy enemy arty. And against con spam, just build mgs.
But its not funny having to L2P!
If someone spams you on 1v1 artyllery...sorry dude i´ve bad news for you.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
1 Feb 2014, 17:34 PM
#109
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I now it's not a negotiation. It should be like the strafe/bombing run in vCOH, where WE HAD TO select the target area. It was a good and well working thing, i dunno why they took it out.
Starfe in vCoH didn't loiter. There was also no indicator, no time to reaction.
It was a single pass of PE and sniper doom.
The only time where you had to select area was henshel AT run.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
2 Feb 2014, 00:35 AM
#110
Posts: 4928
No normal Tiger please, I love how the Tiger Ace is a veteran of the North Africa Campaign, complete with desert camouflage. Just balance the Tiger Ace properly and we can all have fun without calling for nerfs.
What if there was a nerf where the Tiger Ace couldn't turn its turret around backward? Lore wise it makes sense, an Ace wouldn't let himself get flanked, so he would turn the entire tank around once an enemy went passed a certain point (like an assault gun). The Tiger would have about an 80 degree firing arch from the front.
What if there was a nerf where the Tiger Ace couldn't turn its turret around backward? Lore wise it makes sense, an Ace wouldn't let himself get flanked, so he would turn the entire tank around once an enemy went passed a certain point (like an assault gun). The Tiger would have about an 80 degree firing arch from the front.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
2 Feb 2014, 21:58 PM
#111
Posts: 1003
First release was nice. Super powerfull, but gambling unit. Permanent stop income ballance this.
I want to have the same chance, to win for each side.
2 Feb 2014, 23:51 PM
#112
Posts: 647
eh what? lore wise? is this a 40k discussions? if i remember right, penal battalion carried more plasma rifles than svt and wore powered armours by ushanka.incorp. the game representation of penals is bull!
3 Feb 2014, 04:53 AM
#113
Posts: 4928
eh what? lore wise? is this a 40k discussions? if i remember right, penal battalion carried more plasma rifles than svt and wore powered armours by ushanka.incorp. the game representation of penals is bull!
Lore may not have been the right word, but I couldn't think of another. I'm trying to say it could make sense, like how the Tiger Ace is slower because the crew is cautious. In this case, the Tiger Ace "cannot" turn the turret backward because the crew wouldn't allow themselves to be flanked (and would turn the tank around passed a certain point).
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
3 Feb 2014, 05:46 AM
#114
Posts: 1003
eh what? lore wise? is this a 40k discussions? if i remember right, penal battalion carried more plasma rifles than svt and wore powered armours by ushanka.incorp. the game representation of penals is bull!
First release of AT.
I want to have the same chance, to win for each side.
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
Offline
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615222.735-2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
868 users are online:
868 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49132
Welcome our newest member, tik2video
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, tik2video
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM