Stugs are a good counter for T3 soviet units. I don't know why I don't see more ingame.
Stugs need more micro then PzIV.
Posts: 1003
Stugs are a good counter for T3 soviet units. I don't know why I don't see more ingame.
Posts: 2425
Permanently Banned
Stugs need more micro then PzIV.
Posts: 1162
Posts: 177
Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedPosts: 1439
Sovs use and keep using su85 because it has a reliable gun, okay armor and health. The stug doesn't compare. You always end up losing your stug, hell even a IL plane will kill it. The stug is a joke and should be cheaper. Reduce by at least 20 fuel
Posts: 1162
Posts: 747
Nullist, Im not getting into a troll war with you, seen as it seems to be your favorite past time.
I didnt say people dont do T3. I said ''for a long time'' most people went with T4, out of nescesity for decent AT. I myself never liked the SU85 even when it was OP, simply for micro reasons, Ive always played with T3 to be aggresive.
Of course most Soviets do T3 now the T34 is buffed nicely.
Im not attacking German players (rofl), just saying there are currently undersued units which will fill a roll of German AT quite well, particularly in this situation of T34/85 spam.
So that is relevant to this balance discussion.
I will reword my final comment, if it offends you less:
Now soviets have a couple strats with heavy tank use, Germans have not yet adapted their builds propperly by using the dedicated tank killing units.
Posts: 1162
Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedNow soviets have a couple strats with heavy tank use, Germans have not yet adapted their builds propperly by using the dedicated tank killing units.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1108
Posts: 1162
Posts: 971
Nulist, you don't have to buy anything, cos I ain't selling it.
I'm telling you.
Building a P4 is the wrong move when 34/85s are designed to hard counter them. Either teck to panthers, but that's harder and your still going to get mark targeted, which is all why you are better off with stugs protected by screen of paks and grens. They will not reach your stugs then, as Areohawk said. Then save for tiger if you want and use existing AT to protect that also, push them off map.
Posts: 1162
Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedPosts: 1162
Posts: 1162
Posts: 344
MrJafooli: Plenty of people have been going T3 with Sov very successfully.
Infact probably many more than go T4. I dont agree with your conclusions at all.
And I dont appreciate the not so hidden "Ost players dont wnt to adapt" crap.
The same can be said in ewual measure of Sov players. So what?
Its not really any kind of argument on balance, its just hidden ad hominem.
79 | |||||
23 | |||||
15 | |||||
7 | |||||
2 | |||||
133 | |||||
69 | |||||
14 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 |