Has anyone noticed Grenadiers are really good?
Posts: 556
Posts: 1197
If Grens get snares for LVs to not rape them, why isn't that the case for IS?
I can hear some arbitrary arguments coming my way about them somehow needing that to stay balanced.
I'd appreciate it if you give a disclaimer that you're a axis fanboy yourself before you call Katukov a allied one
Literally ask the balance team about that.
Posts: 1197
Are you claiming that Calliope commanders are "dead" and no one uses them?
Do you have anything to back that claim?
Why in your opinion is the Calliope the most durable rocket launcher "extremely risky to use"?
What does that have to do with Grenadiers?
rip rip rip thread you were good
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1197
Ost giga stomping UKF? A coh2 classic!
lmao it's not OST's fault that UKF don't have mainline snares or decent enough force multipliers.
Posts: 786 | Subs: 1
Ost giga stomping UKF? A coh2 classic!
you don't understand, there is a point in the game where 270 manpower beats a 240 manpower 60 muni squad once they spend around 50 fuel, ~300 manpower and around ~90 munitions on pure side teching
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
lmao it's not OST's fault that UKF don't have mainline snares or decent enough force multipliers.
It’s definitely not Ost’s fault. UKF was/is a horribly designed cheese faction that got all its cheese patched out so now it’s just bad.
Posts: 1197
you don't understand, there is a point in the game where 270 manpower beats a 240 manpower 60 muni squad once they spend around 50 fuel, ~300 manpower and around ~90 munitions on pure side teching
Instead of whining, let's think about what realistically can be done about this:
- If you seriously believe that it's a good idea to remove snares and every other difference in combat performace from grens (or any axis mainline for that matter) just so you can even things out with UKF and get that """balance""" you are worse than a retard, you're a threat to society.
- If you argue that UKF needs buffs you are just a simpleton since no update is coming if I am correct.
So, realistically, what's the point?
Posts: 62
So for a mainline to have all the necessary tools to deal with small arms fire is "too advantageous"?
Dafuq
I'm talking about mainline infantry who has the best tools. (Not including those locked behind commanders).
And on top of that, already supported by some of the best starting support weapons (Again, not including those locked by commanders).
Why should they continue to be as cheap as they are?
Posts: 1197
Dafuq
I'm talking about mainline infantry who has the best tools. (Not including those locked behind commanders).
And on top of that, already supported by some of the best starting support weapons (Again, not including those locked by commanders).
Why should they continue to be as cheap as they are?
What you are insinuating with cleverly hidden retarded language is to remove fausts from grens because IS do not "have" them, which is the epitome of stupidity.
Posts: 786 | Subs: 1
What you are insinuating with cleverly hidden retarded language is to remove fausts from grens because IS do not "have" them, which is the epitome of stupidity.
nobody considers grens to be op because of their faust but because they have been eternally used for LMG a move blobbing
stop sperging about le fausts being the prime issue
Posts: 1197
nobody considers grens to be op because of their faust but because they have been eternally used for LMG a move blobbing
stop sperging about le fausts being the prime issue
No you stop sperging about a 4man squad which has a decent weapon.
The ancient balance between OST and SOV should never be altered. Especially to appease idiotic faction-designs like USF/UKF.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
The ancient balance between OST and SOV should never be altered. Especially to appease idiotic faction-designs like USF/UKF.
You realize we are way past the point of that happening, right?
And OKW had hilariously awful design too, not sure why you're leaving them out. The first two WFA factions forced most of the EFAs largest changes
Posts: 1197
You realize we are way past the point of that happening, right?
And OKW had hilariously awful design too, not sure why you're leaving them out. The first two WFA factions forced most of the EFAs largest changes
I agree with you, but it could have been WAY worse if the balance team/relic/whoever is responsible for changes heard everyone.
Just scroll back up this thread, you are going to see people advocating removing fausts and LMG42 from grens because ""they are way too tooled-up in comparison with IS/Riflemen".
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
nobody considers grens to be op because of their faust but because they have been eternally used for LMG a move blobbing
stop sperging about le fausts being the prime issue
No, that's just your rank 5000 4v4 brain speaking.
Gren faust range is fking OP.
Grens were unplayably bad a few years ago, so I wouldn't call that "eternal". But they are definitely cancerous right now.
Posts: 62
What you are insinuating with cleverly hidden retarded language is to remove fausts from grens because IS do not "have" them, which is the epitome of stupidity.
lmao
I've never implied grens should lose their snares, nor do I believe that. 😂 The only epitome of stupidity here is purposely misinterpret my post. I said grens have the best snare, and their range is stupid af
Idk how I can further dumb down my post to say that the a squad that has the best (again not including things locked behind commanders) equipment out of all 5 factions should cost a little more than 240mp
idk how I can dumb this down further, srsly
Posts: 1794
they are not that good, basically a more mobile MG42 unit.
Posts: 100
Posts: 1096
they are not that good, basically a more mobile MG42 unit.
Bruh.
Posts: 1794
Bruh.
yes like MG42, grens need to fire stationary and shitty wind up/down time. Grens cant do chase down wipes.
Grens are in good spot now, fine but nothing OP
to have that massed LMG blob, you are open to so many counters in 2v2.
Livestreams
5 | |||||
156 | |||||
5 | |||||
5 | |||||
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.943411.696-1
- 4.715.934+12
- 5.35659.858+2
- 6.273143.656+6
- 7.278108.720+29
- 8.307114.729+3
- 9.601237.717-2
- 10.10629.785+7
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger