Pfuss vs AssEngi

Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2021, 22:22 PMKlement Pikhtura

We need to chill, because PFs are god damn 15 mp, 20 muni more expensive up front. Of course they should win, because they are more expensive, lmao. The thread can be closed now

Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2021, 08:31 AMVipper

This thread should be closed because it is flawed.

If one thinks that PF are OP one should start a thread about that.

If one thinks that Ass. Eng. are UP one should start a thread about that.

This thread is quite pointless and although "supposedly" is about a specific match up, it does not even provides tests or videos of this match up.

Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2021, 09:19 AMEsxile

Calm down Nobody, if you don't like it then pass on, we're not in your personal backyard here.

Jump back to quoted post16 Aug 2021, 13:25 PMEsxile

Is it normal that AssEngi lose badly vs Pfuss on close combat situation, like realistically you make them turn around a corner on Pfuss and pop they still lose. Its even worst with vet.

No wonder why Armor company is the least pick commander.

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 10:57 AMVipper

This is your OP

at first glance it look more like a you lost a fight using AssEn vs PF and you decided to let some steam of by posting in the forum but lets give you the benefit of the doubt.

A) How many times have you tested AssEng vs PF before deciding they lose badly?
What parameters did you use (weapons, distances, vet)?
(or did this happen to you in one game and you decided to start this thread)

B) In your opinion is it that PF are too good at close range or that AssEng that are bad at close range?

C)Do you really think that the AssEng are the reason Armor company is the least picked commander?
What mod are talking about?

D) Do you actually have any suggestion?

D)Most importantly why did you choose to compare two units with different roles? Why in your opinion the combat performance of these can be used to draw conclusions?

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 12:31 PMEsxile

Those points have already been answered. Read the topic.

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 12:46 PMVipper

Not by you who started this rant, sorry thread. More importantly this would be a much better thread if that info was actually in OP.

Any reasoning why you choose to compare these particular infatry, that have different roles, in combat?

If you do not want to respond to these questions its fine by me.

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 13:45 PMEsxile

As I say calm down. I'm not required to answer again the same questions because you don't agree with what's been said. If you persist on it I'll start questioning your purpose on this topic.

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 14:10 PMVipper

I am perfectly calm.

You have yet to explain why you choose to compare PF vs Ass Eng so pls do not use "again" as if you had give any reasons.

As I said if you do not want to respond to a simply question that other have also asked, simply say no comment but pls lose with this attitude.

And Allow me to close with a word of advice, if you want me to post less in this thread then I suggest you stop quoting me and forcing me to respond to you...

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 14:30 PMEsxile

Where did I ask for a comparison between Pfuss and Assgen? Did I say they have the same role and purpose?

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 14:30 PMEsxile

We all know this is not the first time you're hijacking a topic with your personal logic, didn't you see that people where giving their impression and several also tested it to reach a similar conclusion that pfuss ripe appart Assgen on close combat.

What's your purpose here if you don't read the answer already given and harassing me to repeat again the same thing?

Now for the conclusion, is it normal and balance? I don't think so, but other have a different opinion and I'm not trying to impose in any sort my opinion over their like you try to do with your repetitive questioning.

@moderation, can we clean up this mess with this poster? Their no value in those ultimate answers.

Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2021, 05:04 AMthedarkarmadillo

You don't have to build cover to be an engineer squad. Last I checked cons, even with conscript repair, are not considered "engineers"

You can say "as an alternative mainline" as many times as you would like, it does not make them one.

You are talking about how usf doesn't need ass engies because they have crews (granted last I checked crews couldn't burn out garrisons nor lay mines...) and then say you want them to be alternative mainlines as if USF doesn't have rifles.

USF doesn't have alternative mainlines, at all. They have specialist support squads for the best and most flexible mainline in the game-rifles.
But yes, let's make them an alternative mainline, one that is a "mainline" but actually an engineer.... Like all those other mainlines that lay wire (could you kindly list at least one mainline that can do this? Cause I can list engineers in all factions that can....)

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 15:02 PMKlement Pikhtura

rifles with sandbags and mines and cavrifles are better then ass engies. Change my mind.

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 15:33 PMthedarkarmadillo

Better at what? Repairs? Laying mines? Handling garrisons?
Rifles and cav rifles are combat units. It shouldn't blow your mind that thay are better at combat than an engineer squad.....

Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 15:33 PMthedarkarmadillo

Better at what? Repairs? Laying mines? Handling garrisons?
Rifles and cav rifles are combat units. It shouldn't blow your mind that thay are better at combat than an engineer squad.....