Increase target size of abandoned team weapon.
Posts: 472
And increasing target size of abandoned team weapon in last patch will make game feel less RNG.
It is painful to watch abandoned team weapon dodges all the shot fired from AT/tank and opponent picks it up as if nothing happened.
Any second opinion?
Posts: 486
Posts: 39
Posts: 6
generally they are much more dependent on team weapons and combined arms to counter stronger units as well as more susceptible to wipes thanks to stuka, brumbar, sturmtiger, etc
Posts: 306
this should be seen as a nerf to allies
generally they are much more dependent on team weapons and combined arms to counter stronger units as well as more susceptible to wipes thanks to stuka, brumbar, sturmtiger, etc
this should be seen as a nerf to axis,
generally they are much more dependent on team weapons and combined arms to counter long range Tank destroyers as well as more susceptible to wipes thanks to smaller sqads, kata calli and b4
Posts: 1289
Thus Axis and allied inf are imo wiped about as often.
Not sure if i agree with tw size increase, getting a tw wiped is already punishing. Having it be destroyed so easely feels a bit wrong. Another pusg/move towards "skill" and "removing frustrating expersiences"
Posts: 956
this should be seen as a nerf to allies
generally they are much more dependent on team weapons and combined arms to counter stronger units as well as more susceptible to wipes thanks to stuka, brumbar, sturmtiger, etc
*laughs in Raketen, easiest to wipe AT gun in the game*
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
this should be seen as a nerf to allies
generally they are much more dependent on team weapons and combined arms to counter stronger units as well as more susceptible to wipes thanks to stuka, brumbar, sturmtiger, etc
this should be seen as a nerf to axis,
generally they are much more dependent on team weapons and combined arms to counter long range Tank destroyers as well as more susceptible to wipes thanks to smaller sqads, kata calli and b4
This bias literally hurts to look at
Posts: 786 | Subs: 1
*laughs in Raketen, easiest to wipe AT gun in the game*
(it has a retreat ability anyway)
Posts: 1096
*laughs in Raketen, easiest to wipe AT gun in the game*
Then why is raketen spam in every damn game these days.
Posts: 956
(it has a retreat ability anyway)
Yes, you must press T the moment it's in danger or it's in danger of wipes.
Then why is raketen spam in every damn game these days.
And yet somehow a regular PaK gun would still be better in overall effectiveness. Rak spam is a low skill bracket meme ability.
Posts: 1515
Yes, you must press T the moment it's in danger or it's in danger of wipes.
And yet somehow a regular PaK gun would still be better in overall effectiveness. Rak spam is a low skill bracket meme ability.
Let's be honest, raketen is only ever in danger of a wipe in craters where they clump up (same as every other unit). It's still one of the most survivable AT guns in the game, not to mention it can be played very aggressively. I've seldom seen raketen wipes by infantry, only direct hits by HE tanks when super clumped up. I don't know where this myth that raketen is ez to wipe comes from
Posts: 956
Let's be honest, raketen is only ever in danger of a wipe in craters where they clump up (same as every other unit). It's still one of the most survivable AT guns in the game, not to mention it can be played very aggressively. I've seldom seen raketen wipes by infantry, only direct hits by any non AP tanks when pointing the gun at them. I don't know where this myth that raketen is ez to wipe comes from
I fixed it for you. That and it has an awful tendency to hit the slightest elevation and thus a med tank can get closer without fearing about snares.
It has to be played aggressively because it has a shorter range lol.
Grenades and light artillery do full damage instead of half due to the heavy cover of the gun shield iirc. But that's not a real issue by itself. Someone even looks at you with small arms however....
If by survivable, you mean press T when you need it to shoot then yes. You wouldn't do a shootout with a regular AT gun with a med because you'll just die 90%+ of the time. But I see it all the time with raks.
Posts: 1515
I fixed it for you. That and it has an awful tendency to hit the slightest elevation and thus a med tank can get closer without fearing about snares.
It has to be played aggressively because it has a shorter range lol.
Grenades and light artillery do full damage instead of half due to the heavy cover of the gun shield iirc. But that's not a real issue by itself. Someone even looks at you with small arms however....
If by survivable, you mean press T when you need it to shoot then yes. You wouldn't do a shootout with a regular AT gun with a med because you'll just die 90%+ of the time. But I see it all the time with raks.
Well let's just agree to disagree. I seldom see wiped raketen, by rockets or tank dives. Never even seen a dead raketen by medium dives as it's usually supported. Heck last game a 2 man raketen retreated past 6 bars through yellow cover craters and survived and even though when I play OKW, I play for fun, I've seldom lost a super aggressive raketen to anything. Well maybe nades if clumped up.
Posts: 786 | Subs: 1
Yes, you must press T the moment it's in danger or it's in danger of wipes.
And yet somehow a regular PaK gun would still be better in overall effectiveness. Rak spam is a low skill bracket meme ability.
you must retreat any and all AT guns when they are in imminent danger bro...
If it didn't have the retreat ability then it would have been a different story
but it does, it also has a 5 man crew with that retreat.
both Pak and raketen spam is annoying tbh
Posts: 658
Let's be honest, raketen is only ever in danger of a wipe in craters where they clump up (same as every other unit). It's still one of the most survivable AT guns in the game, not to mention it can be played very aggressively. I've seldom seen raketen wipes by infantry, only direct hits by HE tanks when super clumped up. I don't know where this myth that raketen is ez to wipe comes from
Too be honest Raketenwerfers are borderline OP when it comes to its ability to survive and shut down Medium Tank play with ease. Its main gun isn't the best obviously which is what most people look at but when you take into consideration the pressure the Rak can do and how its the only AT Gun that you can use offensively without a real risk of losing it.
Posts: 472
That's very pointless argument. Axis claimed raket was fine even when it had camoflauge-move. Since it has been removed, they have much more reason to believe it is underperforming. Go fight over it in other thread...
Livestreams
1 | |||||
928 | |||||
10 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
10 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, nohu90forum
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM