Not in Italy.
Neither was the BP in Italy. What is your point?
Posts: 518
Not in Italy.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Neither was the BP in Italy. What is your point?
Ik ik ... BP is a Tank of the Brits which were in Italy while the other stuff is from Russians which were not in Italy. But why would it be ok to be able to order a prototype tank from more than 4000 km far way because "Alt-History" but not ok to request a paradrop crate from Soviet planes that contains Soviet Weapons?
After all it would "add fun and variety" ... and the average player wouldn't be able to tell that it are soviet weapons anyways ; )
Posts: 518
If they wanted to add a DLC where there's a soviet front in Italy, all the more power to them.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
If this is how things would turn out then I honestly would consider not buying this game (at least not at full price) simply because I would feel scammed.
They asked the community what they want. The answer was Italy so they promised us Italy while claiming that they want to be historical accurate
If we get Russians and late-war super Heavies then it will be CoH2 all over again
Also keep in mind that so far there is no Italy faction confirmed which is (iirc) partially because "they had no good tanks" ...
Posts: 518
I personally did not vote for Italy, as I do not want to buy the same factions for the third time. And many of my friends did not vote either. So this quote is just a handy cover for the failure of CoH2's single player campaign. Giving up on the Eastern Front is stupid. It's like giving up a huge, delicious piece of cake. The Eastern Front still has a ton of unused units and unreleased stories.
Posts: 1594
Not in Italy.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
So what? It would take just one human decision to ship all of these things to
Italy from the USSR.
Posts: 1594
There's no Russian army in the game at the moment
Maybe there will be. Would be amusing. Include new things for multiplatyer and let us have a new mini campaign, seems like ideal DLC content to me.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Russian army? Nah, just let the UKF have all of that Russian gear. Just one decision would have let them do it.
Posts: 76
Not a decision by the british, which is who you are playing as, and making the decisions for.
Posts: 1217
Posts: 1594
Not a decision by the british, which is who you are playing as, and making the decisions for.
Posts: 1594
From what it seems the Panther is going to be doctrinal since there were low numbers of it in Italy. (And I love that decision.)
Meanwhile that thing is facing tanks that was never deployed just because. (Utter bullshit.)
This game is seriously wasting potential to depict the frontline in Italy in a meaningful manner.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Says who? The British could very well have bought the technical package for the T-34 and produced their own in this retarded fantasy timeline we're inventing here.
Posts: 1594
Black prince is a vehicle that is in the UK Motor Pool.
Posts: 956
From what it seems the Panther is going to be doctrinal since there were low numbers of it in Italy. (And I love that decision.)
Meanwhile that thing is facing tanks that was never deployed just because. (Utter bullshit.)
This game is seriously wasting potential to depict the frontline in Italy in a meaningful manner.
Posts: 518
I sincerely hope it does not become doctrinal. Expensive sure, but doc is another restriction entirely. I can already see the meta quickly developing around one commander ugh.
BP is confirmed doctrinal from current game version for what it's worth.
Posts: 956
Honestly: I can already see this causing problems.
Picked a commander that has no Nashorn or Panther? Good luck fighting BP with Panzer 4s while your tanks can get (at least until now) 2 shotted by their non-doc TDs
Try with DAK for extra fun ...
Posts: 518
Well, hope they balance that out. This isn't Blitzkrieg. The 4 shot medium profile is proven to work fine.
Posts: 455
6 | |||||
853 | |||||
14 | |||||
5 | |||||
5 |