Posts: 1660
It was more a question than a statement. I havnt played the vanilla campaign in a dog's age, but I thought there were "lesser" AT in the campaign and early TOW missions
Posts: 1515
It would be nice to have an at gun that has at least a shield for the gunner and loader
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Sure, but remove retreat then.
And the shield mechanic is buggy AF. Not really something that is detrimental when trying to defend the AT gun. Retreat is still the best feature on raketen, one that saves it more times than all the gun shields combined on all factions.
Posts: 1660
Sure, but remove retreat then.
And the shield mechanic is buggy AF. Not really something that is detrimental when trying to defend the AT gun. Retreat is still the best feature on raketen, one that saves it more times than all the gun shields combined on all factions.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
I don't see it ever being used except for when the at gun is recrewed under heavy fire, which honestly probably benefits team weapon stealer more than owner.
Posts: 5279
Uh yeah, sounds fine to me. I just find weird that so many people are pissed off by retreat. I don't see it ever being used except for when the at gun is recrewed under heavy fire, which honestly probably benefits team weapon stealer more than owner.
Posts: 1660
Except for the fact that having retreat should make it easier for you to prevent the de-crew in the first place...
Posts: 682
Retreat only improves RA, it's actually easier than other ATgun to catch with tanks, especially because it rotates when retreating. Tanks are the true threat to AT guns veterancy
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Retreat only improves RA, it's actually easier than other ATgun to catch with tanks, especially because it rotates when retreating. Tanks are the true threat to AT guns veterancy
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
130 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
