Posts: 167
I just saw tightrope video of UKF particularly Raid sections and Vickers K... is this a joke or what? Winning every single engagement regardless of vet and range, congrats! Engineers/vickers/and other type of infantry units no need to be used anymore!
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I just saw tightrope video of UKF particularly Raid sections and Vickers K... is this a joke or what? Winning every single engagement regardless of vet and range, congrats! Engineers/vickers/and other type of infantry units no need to be used anymore!
Posts: 789
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Recovery sappers are a bit lame right now - not worth a commader slot just for the ability to throw smoke grenades and salvage.
maybe they could be given lee enfields and the ability to build bunkers and sandbags?
and then they could be added to advanced emplacements, so that advanced emplacements could build bunkers, and make advanced emplacements less one dimensional-emplacements only?.
Posts: 789
Recovery sapper come with smoke grenades/salvage/increased repair speed. They are quite a useful unit.
Posts: 203
uh i just dont think that the smoke nades and salvage is a full commader slot i guess.
they do start with better repair speed but i think -? that normal engineers can get that saim repair speed after minesweeper + bolster?
I just was hoping to make them more flavorful and unique i guess. i guess not
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
uh i just dont think that the smoke nades and salvage is a full commader slot i guess.
they do start with better repair speed but i think -? that normal engineers can get that saim repair speed after minesweeper + bolster?
I just was hoping to make them more flavorful and unique i guess. i guess not
Posts: 203
I just saw tightrope video of UKF particularly Raid sections and Vickers K... is this a joke or what? Winning every single engagement regardless of vet and range, congrats! Engineers/vickers/and other type of infantry units no need to be used anymore!
Posts: 789
Maybe not. I was simply point out that that they are not a bad unit.
I guess one could try the following:
"Field Recovery Operation" renamed to "Royal Sapper" move "Advanced Emplacement Regiment" replacing
"Defensive Operations".
Ability allow to build Royal sapper from HQ (CP 0 call-in should be avoided since it map depended)
Unit has savage, smoke grenades and come with 5 rifles. Repair speed replaced by 20% repair speed to emplacement plus no damage penalty when repairing.
This should solve repairing issue for the commander.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
u have to compare the raid section to other doctrinal infantry like jäger light from okw not to mainline
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
I just saw tightrope video of UKF particularly Raid sections and Vickers K... is this a joke or what? Winning every single engagement regardless of vet and range, congrats! Engineers/vickers/and other type of infantry units no need to be used anymore!
Posts: 167
I still dream of the day people consider a preview an actual preview (i.e. a testing ground) and keep in mind that especially in the first iteration there are going to be a lot of values that need further tweaking. We're creating a new weapon here, is it really a surprise that the values might be off on the first try? Wait for further iterations before coming up with these kind of remarks please. This type of feedback is worthless.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Maybe not. I was simply point out that that they are not a bad unit.
I guess one could try the following:
"Field Recovery Operation" renamed to "Royal Sapper" move "Advanced Emplacement Regiment" replacing
"Defensive Operations".
Ability allow to build Royal sapper from HQ (CP 0 call-in should be avoided since it map depended)
Unit has savage, smoke grenades and come with 5 rifles. Repair speed replaced by 20% repair speed to emplacement plus no damage penalty when repairing.
This should solve repairing issue for the commander.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
I still dream of the day people consider a preview an actual preview (i.e. a testing ground) and keep in mind that especially in the first iteration there are going to be a lot of values that need further tweaking. We're creating a new weapon here, is it really a surprise that the values might be off on the first try? Wait for further iterations before coming up with these kind of remarks please. This type of feedback is worthless.
Posts: 1220
I still dream of the day people consider a preview an actual preview (i.e. a testing ground) and keep in mind that especially in the first iteration there are going to be a lot of values that need further tweaking. We're creating a new weapon here, is it really a surprise that the values might be off on the first try? Wait for further iterations before coming up with these kind of remarks please. This type of feedback is worthless.
Posts: 1220
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Unit name Raid section sounds ok but i think that unit should represent foreigners something like ostrupen.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Think voice lines is the main issue...
Canandian or australian section sound like it. especially australian, if the loadout is 5-6 man squad with molo and cheap reinfoce cost, resemble conscript.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Think voice lines is the main issue...
 |
|
|
34 | ||
 |
|
|
178 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
