No I'm not, you're just completely missing the point. Howitzer RNG is something you can actually account for. Vision and range effect the outcome. Abandon cannot be accounted for. There's no effecting it, it's just a random 5% chance
Yeah so it encourages camping and stale play. That's not a good thing
Losing the tank is already a punishment. I will never understand people who make that point
"You deserve to get punished for over-extending"
Losing a 120 fuel investment is not a punishment? What game are you playing? The problem isn't the player getting punished, it's the opponent getting an extra reward for no good reason
How ever you look at it howitsers and off map arty are still massive rng. You only decide the location and when.
Dont dive a enemy base with 1 tank and 4 at sources close by, thats your controle for not abandoning it in the enemy base. That prevents the opponent from getting rewarded for no good reason. If it was out in the field he could destroy it before it was captured.
He pushed it into base with 2 zisses and 2 t34's around. He would have lost the tank anyway but probably would have taken out a second t34 who where low hp if it didnt get mgc. He had the opponent down to 40 victory point to his 200+. He got overconfident and got punished hard, the p4 got fixed and used against him, while he played fantasticly up until that point.
No it doesnt only encourage camping and stale play. In allows for unexpected comebacks.
The game i am talking about was pretty one sided and stale, the soviets was behind all game. A stale and predictable boring game. If the p4 did get both t34's it would be game over and no point watching further.
And where did i say loosing 120 fuel isent a punishment? Please stop foaming, i play the same game you do. I just appriciate a certain bit of the game you cant seem to even grasp why i like it. I can understand why you dont, but as i said to others there are plenty stale and boring high click no or low rng rts's out there.