Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Wouldn't this be a better option?
Also, what kind of clear obstacle do Sappers have?
Posts: 1515
I guess one could test but I think pak43 is underused already so I see little reason to go through the trouble.
Clear obstacles that small explosive they have. Also available doctrinal to assault engineers and Pioneer via upgrade.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I'd agree it's underused in 1v1 and 2v2 due to the nature of those mods. However, from my experience (3v3), pak43 is used in pretty much every game. Of course, it's my problem that I only play random teams so coordination is not the main deal in those games. I mean, last 4 games my teammates left after losing one squad: "gg, we lost, you suck" and then disconnect...some top 20 3v3 players no less. All in all, giving pak43 better survivability/clearing blockers would be more "normal" than have it shoot through buildings on it's own.
Posts: 1515
I have not seen so many pak43 in 3vs3, maybe it more map deepened?
Suggest you try priest. It completely counter the pak43.
Posts: 65
Posts: 930
a bunch of crap
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
you didn't read my post, if you use tacmap bug you can easily snipe any support weapons since they all have 20 size, also SU have 60 vision, if you use 2 SU85's you have a very good chance of sniping a pak before it can fire twice.
Posts: 1515
Are you seriously suggesting to use tank destroyers against an ATG?
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1
17 pounder can brace but is also a meme emplacement.
Posts: 930
Are you seriously suggesting to use tank destroyers against an ATG?
Just ignore him like I have. I considered reporting him but naaaah. Ignore.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
yes, support guns are vehicles and TDs are anti-vehicles units, what is so hard to grasp?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 930
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I just did, with video proof lmao
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 956
Do not underestimate 17p. It's very good, powerfull AT when you know where and when to build it. 1 or 2 shots of it can decide of entire engament and fate of the entire game.
Posts: 930
Yeah, checked it out after posting, its targeting priority umm issue?
With regular ATGs, its the crew that is being targeted, not the gun.
Reverse seems to be the case for pak43.
Posts: 65
nope, this happens with any support weapons, test yourself, get a sniper and shoot at a MG using the tacmap, the sniper will shoot at the mg and won't kill anyone, this is a bug and relic probably knew about this, this is why support weapons are invincible when they are crewed because if they weren't you could just snipe anything using tanks or ATGs.
you can still do that but the gun will have 0.1% health when it get decrewed. I guess relic never bothered fixing since it requires a little bit of micro to pull it off.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Are you seriously suggesting to use tank destroyers against an ATG?
Posts: 1594
It has already been acknowledge by the community and tournament creators as an abuse in a "mechanic" (it's listed in all the latest tournament rules).
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w8FH7HtM-7CYh54xrK2WQnXeBNuN7E05tYGOD3CQy3U/edit#heading=h.yf2ptvtw94x5
Posts: 65
"a possible game feature"
I do have to be honest, I'm not really sure how they could come to that conclusion.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
"a possible game feature"
I do have to be honest, I'm not really sure how they could come to that conclusion.
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
216 | ||
|
|
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
