Can we plz "fix" the CalliOPe?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 33
Jacksons and Zook'ed Rangers, even AT guns (with its active ability).
I wouldn't risk losing my super expensive Panther over your Calliope like that since it has a slow ROF and bad accuracy on the move.
Meanwhile you can just suicide dive with some Shermans or T-34s and can take out all of our rocket artillery, since they die in 1 shot anyway and those mediums are cheap to replace.
"cheap sherman" lol... dude you dont dive a sherman against axis, who all have snares to maybe kill enemy arty - maybe if they are braindead and leave them close by.
Fact is, if you ever played 4v4 as USF, Caliope is the only unit that keeps you alive.
Posts: 33
Then you win every time with that cancerous unit unless your teammates are dumb enough to let the enemy team rush you with massed Panthers.
As long as Calliope exists, there is no late game infantry for Axis.
No, axis still can counter caliope, but not as easy as everything else
Posts: 219
must confess i struggle alot against Urban thingamjig doctrine, while playing OST.
say USF has 3x Rangers+zooks and 3x calliopes, how would you deal with the calliopes as OST?
Posts: 1220
Posts: 1220
FireflyAT.
USF has 3x Rangers+zooks and 3x calliopes, how would you deal with the calliopes as OST?
You can do the same werfers and panzergeranadiers are cheaper and non doc.
Posts: 219
I appreciate your input but:
since urban assault has the smoke thing that makes infantry move faster, hitting 3x rangerzooks with werfer that already has a notable delay between firing and impact, makes it EASY to dodge/spread infantry out.
plus pzgrens shreks get slaughtered by calliopes with barely a second warning before impact.
other useful tips would be welcome
Posts: 33
FireflyAT.
must confess i struggle alot against Urban thingamjig doctrine, while playing OST.
say USF has 3x Rangers+zooks and 3x calliopes, how would you deal with the calliopes as OST?
Well 3 Calliopes are sooo much fuel, well if you have Panzerwerfer, Brumbär and a Panther, as soon as the Ranger retreat you can try to push in a bit, but generaly Brumbär is the most important tank as ost, with vet1 he gets longrange bombardment that outranges AT guns. . Also Panzerwerfer ofter wipes multiple squads like the Caliope.
imho the only other lategame USF you can pick is IR Pathfinder, they can wreck Superheavys so your jacksons are not completly useless.
Posts: 33
SupremeStefan.
I appreciate your input but:
since urban assault has the smoke thing that makes infantry move faster, hitting 3x rangerzooks with werfer that already has a notable delay between firing and impact, makes it EASY to dodge/spread infantry out.
plus pzgrens shreks get slaughtered by calliopes with barely a second warning before impact.
other useful tips would be welcome
Also try playing with Elefant commander + Spotting scope, it helps alot to see them coming and after the 2nd brumbär shot infantry has to retreat
Posts: 5279
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
You can do the same werfers and panzergeranadiers are cheaper and non doc.
They're just a lot worse. PGrens are a 4-man squad while werfer rockets take forever to reach and are easily dodged even by those with 56k connections. Worse still, Werfer has only 1 salvo so there isn't even an area-denial/pushing opportunity. With continuous bombardment rocket artillery, you can actually use that to support a tank push.
Calliope is so good I actually use the doctrine in 1 v 1, since it saves the trouble/cost of teching Captain + unlock for pack howie. The Calliope is almost impossible to dive and can even survive double PAK. Even as a 1 v 1 main it's a ridiculous unit. I can imagine it being hell for team game players.
Posts: 1515
They're just a lot worse. PGrens are a 4-man squad while werfer rockets take forever to reach and are easily dodged even by those with 56k connections. Worse still, Werfer has only 1 salvo so there isn't even an area-denial/pushing opportunity. With continuous bombardment rocket artillery, you can actually use that to support a tank push.
Calliope is so good I actually use the doctrine in 1 v 1, since it saves the trouble/cost of teching Captain + unlock for pack howie. The Calliope is almost impossible to dive and can even survive double PAK. Even as a 1 v 1 main it's a ridiculous unit. I can imagine it being hell for team game players.
While I agree, from my experience, I usually lost team games where my mates went for callope. On one hand, it is good in area denial, but 90% of the time, people will just fall back a bit and wait it out, especially since later on there are elephants with spotting scopes and LeFH, so falling back a bit won't net you a loss. I honestly think that @Achpawel's proposal to reduce speed/rotation after using the barrage would be the best way. If you decrease ROF of rockets... that can go both ways. On one hand, less shit/second, on other, longer area denial (assuming same amount of rockets). If you decrease survivability, it becomes meh, since it's not as lethal as other rocket arty. But if you decrease mobility, you decrease the possibility to do shotgun salvos (which callope needs to do to be effective) without risking death. And definitely Calliope should get 100% penetrated at all ranges by P4.
It all depends on what you are after. Werfer takes some time to land and produces a distinct sound, but when it lands it kills infantry. It's most definitely the best are denier, fast but 100% that infantry will retreat (or a lot and lot of bleed).
Stuka has the wiping potential, easy to predict where the rockets will land and when they land, cars, light vehicles, infantry and team weapons usually go bye-bye or will need repairs. On team maps like Port of hamburg, stuka and werfer potential is amplified ten fold because of the lane-y maps and usual forward positions. A lot of impassable terrain makes for great werfer and stuka plays.
Still I would say that the biggest danger is the scatter. If you have super precise barrages, the enemy will know where they can/cannot go. Example. Werfer barrage. Not until 1 second in do you know whether you are on the margin of the AOE or dead-center. Stuka you really need to side pedal a lot or risk dying (side pedal because 90% of players aim for retreat paths).
Posts: 176
Make Calliop a passive upgrade that allow a normal Sherman to upgrade into Calliop. Just like Sherman Bulldozer in Mechanize & FF Tulip.
Then every barage requires more ammo.
But then it may lead to 25pop cap (2 Sherman with Cali upgrade) and can do both arty & frontline at the same time.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Making their rocket arty require doctrine and muni seems like too much of punishment
Posts: 1515
Posts: 466
other aspects of the faction needs to be looked at before nerfing it.
its locked behind a doctrine.
lets rather fix the stuka. a unit that has always over peformed from day one.
also its a medium tank. it cant be a one shot kill like the wefer, besides the werfer is a cardboard box on wheels
Posts: 63
Posts: 282
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I don't see how anyone can think tanky rocket-launcher are okay. It completely removes the burden of protecting them.
From small arms infantry.
Go ahead, give it 10-12 seconds alone time with shrecks or puma and see what happens.
Posts: 2243
From small arms infantry.
Go ahead, give it 10-12 seconds alone time with shrecks or puma and see what happens.
too long ..compared with other rocket launcher where schrecks or puma needs 1/4sec
Livestreams
8 | |||||
4 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.605218.735+1
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1109614.644+10
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM