Infantry sections are too strong, which often leads to blobbing.
So here are my suggestions.
Infantry sections dps nerfed when not in cover, cover dps remains unchanged.
Vickers mg rate of fire increased, so it can suppress better.
Brits changes
28 Jun 2020, 22:44 PM
#1
Posts: 469
28 Jun 2020, 22:48 PM
#2
Posts: 600
yo kuhlmann, first cons now sections, guess you over night figured out whats wrong with the game, eh?
29 Jun 2020, 01:18 AM
#3
Posts: 66
wtf, enuff with the brit nerfs, nobody is playing them rite neow!
29 Jun 2020, 05:39 AM
#4
Posts: 479
I would be ok with Tommies being slightly worse out of cover but Vickers definitely needs a buff to compensate.
29 Jun 2020, 09:25 AM
#6
Posts: 955
Infantry sections are too strong, which often leads to blobbing.
So here are my suggestions.
Infantry sections dps nerfed when not in cover, cover dps remains unchanged.
Vickers mg rate of fire increased, so it can suppress better.
Thats a very reasonable suggestion
Anything that leads to less of boring 4X IS builds (just occasionaly interrupted by UC) and more combined arms will be a blessing
"Nice. Very impressive. Now let´s see Paul Allen´s playercard."
29 Jun 2020, 13:28 PM
#7
Posts: 143
Uhm. short question and i think it fits here quite well:
The cover bonues they get. Do they get it on the move too? Late game example: the map is full of explosion craters. Would tommies fight more efficently then?
The cover bonues they get. Do they get it on the move too? Late game example: the map is full of explosion craters. Would tommies fight more efficently then?
29 Jun 2020, 13:30 PM
#8
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Uhm. short question and i think it fits here quite well:yes
The cover bonues they get. Do they get it on the move too? Late game example: the map is full of explosion craters. Would tommies fight more efficently then?
29 Jun 2020, 19:07 PM
#9
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedMy suggestion has always been revert cost to 280 and moving DPS from 50% down to 25% instead of this bolster "nerf." There's ZERO reasons why sections need to be just as good as everyone else on the move when their static DPS, both in and out of cover, is legendary.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
29 Jun 2020, 19:08 PM
#10
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedMy suggestion has always been revert cost to 280 and moving DPS from 50% down to 25% instead of this bolster "nerf." There's ZERO reasons why sections need to be just as good as everyone else on the move when their static DPS, both in and out of cover, is legendary.
If u want DPS just stop the section. Simple as that. Their no longer bedridden to hugging cover to get their full DPS.
And with all the doctrines with CQC units, the sections don't need to excel at attacking.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
29 Jun 2020, 19:56 PM
#11
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
My suggestion has always been revert cost to 280 and moving DPS from 50% down to 25% instead of this bolster "nerf." There's ZERO reasons why sections need to be just as good as everyone else on the move when their static DPS, both in and out of cover, is legendary.
And what is the reason why they should not be?
The faction lost EVERY SINGULAR GIMMICK it had that would justify under performance of some units in certain areas.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
29 Jun 2020, 20:41 PM
#12
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
And what is the reason why they should not be?
The faction lost EVERY SINGULAR GIMMICK it had that would justify under performance of some units in certain areas.
I just said the reason. Sections are unbeatable by axis mainlines when sections are not moving. They're easily more cost effective than rifles and somehow are 10mp cheaper. And volks just got 10mp more expensive but sections beat volks quite comfortably yet their the difference between the two squads is only a measly 10mp instead of the 30mp that used to be. Grens lose to sections at such a large margin when both are in cover, so why do the sections have to excel in EVERY WAY POSSIBLE?
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
29 Jun 2020, 22:39 PM
#13
Posts: 2358
I am going to be completely honest here. I like more sections as they are, even if i said they werent before.
I think that understanding how important early map control is crucial to balance mainlines. OKW and OST might need a relook in further patches.
I think that understanding how important early map control is crucial to balance mainlines. OKW and OST might need a relook in further patches.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
249 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
754 users are online:
754 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM