FINALLY remove the MORTAR PIT!

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 09:16 AMKhan

Let's give brace to the Pak 43 as well then!

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 09:16 AMKhan

Let's give brace to the Pak 43 as well then!

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 09:23 AMKatitof

Sure thing, but you'll have to give shot blockers piercing away for it and increase its cost and pop by 50%.

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 09:50 AMAarotron

Or just you know. Have normal mortar in hammer and pit in anvil.

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 09:50 AMAarotron

Or just you know. Have normal mortar in hammer and pit in anvil.

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 10:11 AMSupport Sapper

Mortar but at the timing of comet ?

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 10:17 AMVipper

Anvil/hammer choice could/should be available for all tiers. It would make UKF allot easier to balance.

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 10:38 AMSuperHansFan

I disagree

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 10:38 AMSuperHansFan

It should give you two different play styles but should unlock earlier. You might pick one for early game advantage but that will also effect your late game playstyle.

This would give risk reward and allow axis to prepare for late game better

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 06:27 AMLatch

But they cant move and are the only MP option for inderect non doctrinal, if they didn't have brace they would be beyond useless. Brace has been through many changes and where it is at now is the best of both words. Trigger a brace, wait for it to end, attack like brace never existed.

Unless you want to add a retreat function to the mortar pit of course?

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2020, 10:11 AMSupport Sapper

Mortar but at the timing of comet ?

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2020, 09:43 AMullumulu

the thing is:

- brace has to short reload time
- cost no resources

- can hold to much dmg (50kg stuka bomb/ sturmtiger rockets, heavy costly muni abilitys) there should no way in the game to avoid 250muni with one click with no cost for static buildings...else give this shit to all static buildings for all

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2020, 11:08 AMKatitof

So does "retreat" on infantry.




That's SPECIFICALLY why brace exists.

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2020, 12:15 PMachpawel

Brace is just a bad idea from the beginning. Will somebody finally try at least to think what I wrote in many UKF treads? Make sapper deconstruct emplacements with say 50-60% resource refunded. This will make them: less static, will make UKF bleed if they decide to move them, add some more dynamisms to emplacement play making it more surprising as the enemy will (to some extend) not expect if the emplacement is still there. And most importantly, it will make it possible to get rid of brace altogether or just nerf it (muni paid, shorter duration, or the mixture of both).

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2020, 12:43 PMSupport Sapper

Actually sapper can already deconstruct emplacements for 100mp refund, but the whole system still suck.