Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
I didn't say it should take up both slots i said it should lock out any upgrade
When you purchase a flamer or seeeper on CEs/pios it locks out any other upgrade, but they still have a weapon slot if they find a dropped weapon
Posts: 3053
Negative clear speed?.... So when they are suppressed they lay mines....?
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1954
anoterh case of "i couldnt find countermeasures against a unit with no combat value so i immediately start a balance thread"
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
But sweepers already do lock out upgrades. Weapon racks are not upgrades, they are picking up weapons.
Posts: 76
Ah yes, halftrack clown cars that come at like 9 minutes. Truly the scourge of the meta right now.
That gave me a good laugh.
Posts: 1351
It should just take a weapon slot. I don't think it needs to take up both slots.
Posts: 1351
Pretty self explanatory, it makes no sense even for a video game and causes balance issues when engineer units can equip sweepers as well as double at weaponry in half tracks that reach f1 Ferrari speeds with step on it.
*Meant to put detect not clear mines in title*
Posts: 833
Posts: 1351
Someone hide this thread from twisted tootsys precious eyes
Posts: 5279
Something doesn't have to be meta to be unbalanced and there is no reason in "realism" or balance that a guy in the back of a half track should be detecting mines while it zooms around at 60mph firing bazookas and makes the game look like fortnight, may as well let pios sit on the back of tigers detecting mines.
Posts: 143
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 76
Alright I get it.
For a more realistic approach I propose we change the animation to the sweeper model laying on the hood with the sweeper in front of the half track. This way we get a visual cue there is something fishy.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1351
For realism purposes there's no such as a thing as friendly mines. Leave it be and make sweeper occupy a weapon slot.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Sweepers occupying a weapon slot is a good idea.
But there is hope with half-tracks too maybe. If okw can holster sweeper the same mechanism could be used to make them not work once engines enter halftracks/buildings.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I don't see it as a bad mechanic. People only complain cause they might had faced someone inspired by non meta TT Zook bus play.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 76
^This.
Don't try to turn the game into a snorefest, just because you were surprised by something unexpected and had no idea how to counter it first time you've seen it.
ESPECIALLY if you haven't even faced it yourself and just observed it on twitch.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Well aside from making coh2 look like a children's game with half tracked vehicles tokyo drifting around tanks with anime physics looking ridiculous it negates one of the main counters of vehicles which is mines.
Changing this is not going to make the game a "snoozefest" any more than the changes to stopping soviet snipers in clowncars and elite troop training your team mates infantry and tanks to vet 3 before they fired a single round or swarms of sprinting falls and shocks with valient assault/mother russia or the snipers with predator camo from coh1.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
108 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
158 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
