Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I think it would make this more of a trade-off than it is; I personally am sympathetic to those not wanting to nerf or remove this ability but making it a vet 1 ability would make this more like the desperate act that it should be than a 300mp 90fu snare.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 785
What is trade off for using blitz or comabt blitz? What is trade off for radio net? What is trade off for cromwells shot? Do any of these make you lose a tank?
Posts: 203
They are also less likely to cripple another tank, and exist on generally more expensive units. I have said before - I am sympathetic to retaining T-34 ram as is, but the criticism of the ability as it is currently implemented does not seem unfounded to me, and a vet requirement would intrinsically make this ability more difficult and somewhat more situational to pull off by virtue of vetting a tank to that level. All the same, vetting a T-34 is not an extremely difficult task.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I think it would make this more of a trade-off than it is; I personally am sympathetic to those not wanting to nerf or remove this ability but making it a vet 1 ability would make this more like the desperate act that it should be than a 300mp 90fu snare.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Posts: 833
I think making the Ram a Skill shot would probably be the best solution if you don't want to touch the rocket strafe. However, the actual best solution would be to nerf the rocket strafe. Nerfing Ram because of Airborn cheese is like nerfing Grenadiers because G43s are too good.
Posts: 40
 | Playercard of Scoped | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 772
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
