Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
If you give it more penetration and lower rate of fire it improves against heavies and becomes worse vs mediums, which dramaticlaly improves the situation since it’s less oppressive vs medium tank play and improves usf in teamgames vs Elephant/Jagdtiger.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
And again what do think is penetration values of M36?
Have you tried 2 M36 with HVAP vs an Elephant or JT?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Well you know Pz4s are already obliterating infantry AND dealing USF sherman at the same time.
What I propose is one OR the other with an upgrade. Now if it requires a fuel price increase or the upgrade being a spit fuel/munition, so be it. I haven't even say the sherman should be better than the Pz4, just at the same level when it get skirts so it can fight the OKW version reliably.
I don't see the Ez8 proposal being a straight buff, you get a one unit limited that can't be mixed with other pershing or Calliope and it would have similar characteristic with the panther.
Then in exchange, the M36 is nerfed so it is only relevant vs panthers and heaviest units.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Doing brain stuff seems to be harder and harder for you with every consecutive day, so let me help you:
If it hits, it should pen, not relay on yet another roll if it was to shoot very slowly.
Replay if you still don't get it, I'll get some crayons and scanner and we'll try again.
Then don't.
After all, I haven't written a book on how silly your suggestions are, despite multiple people telling you this on a daily basis, balance modders included, yet you still keep regurgitating them out.
Posts: 327
If Jackson is nerfed, the USF faction itself can fall
So we need to give the USF new options and nerf Jackson
Posts: 203
Why would a cheaper main battle tank be able to beat a more expensive main battle tank?
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Where does this idea come from that USF has no at-options outside of the M36 when they have virtually the same AT-capabilities as all other factions?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
If no other option is more attractive than using Jackson, USF users will continue to use Jackson only
Thank you.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Tell you what. Lets stop here so you can take some time and think what exactly you want propose and pls come back with a clear proposal with some rough estimation of number if possible.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Posts: 214
From the potency of these alternatives.
Can you kill P4 with Stuart?
Becayuse you can kill all medium tanks in game with Puma.
Have you ever used USF RET mines? They do not exactly OHK all lights.
M20 mines? Require fuel, on easy to lose unit, tech dependent.
ATG is best with ability used, worst without it, all you have to do to hardcounter it is to move away for 30 seconds then move back in and watch it bounce off of your vet2 P4 or tiger.
Bazookas are good only on elite troops or massed RETs, while 1 PG squad, if not focused will do the AT work.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
And ??? u combine these like in combined arms and u can fight of relieble all Axis amor.
It requires some skill and thats the point about it. ... u dont want use combined arms... u want a unit that does all that for u while sitting back at 60 Range.
It seems that u dont understand Faction design at all...
When USF should be using combined arms against Axsis armor .. none of the other options even exist for u
When Axis Inf gets buttfucked by allied Inf ... "Muh use MG`s mines .... flanks grenades combined arms"
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Why should cheaper main battle tank be able to beat a more expensive AT only platform?
Because thats what all your whining about Jackson suggests.
Not sure what's the point of this thread is, Jackson isn't going anywhere, it's the only decent source of non-doc mobile AT USF has, not even super-powered AT gun and M4A3 buffs will change that.
Jackson isn't and won't be an "option", unless we do some drasting changes (or nerf it into non-existence)
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
229 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
