Pwerfer on T3

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 14:17 PMOrangePest

No.
This is a retarded idea honestly, it adds nothing and would just turn into ostheer domination because they can get one out at 13 min no problem.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 14:17 PMOrangePest

No.
This is a retarded idea honestly, it adds nothing and would just turn into ostheer domination because they can get one out at 13 min no problem.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 08:34 AMdistrofio

False.
OKW can get a Wstuka faster than OST even if pwerfer its in T3. OST teching is simply more expensive and takes even more time.

SWS (15)+ Mechanized (45) + WStuka (100) = 160Fu

BP1 (40) + BP2 (90) + T3(15) + PWerfer (85) = 250 Fu

And OST didnt build neither T1 nor T2 wich is pretty dumb. 222/250/251 or 250MHT are common sight on OST.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 15:36 PMPrinceps

It would delay the P4 and give u instead a fragile inf blobb counter.
This would make u vulnerable to early Tanks.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 15:46 PMdistrofio

Pz4 is hardly a crutch unit against well supported team weapons and all allied factions meta have been turning into tw rather mainline powerhouse.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 16:29 PMdistrofio

My bad I wad wrong, it is not 250 but 230, for still as you said yourself, no one rushes atika, why would they rush pwerfer.

If okw suffers from the lack of fuel, ost would a well, because it's techs are delayed.

Okw stuka build don't need swererpanzerHQ nor its authorization

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 16:50 PMKubelecer

Did you know your T4 can lock down several points and secure you resource income for your stuka? It will also protect your stuka later against dives.

Did you know your T4 unlocks Obers that you probably need since you were probably losing mid game because u had nothing to contest infantry and LVs with except volks?

Did you know Ost as a faction has way better tools to support a pwerfer rush since they have linear tech and better team weapons and would get werfer in the same building they get Stugs and p4s compared to OKW that is forced to miss out on non ammo healing by going mechanical to even unlock stukas?

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 17:22 PMZeroZeroNi

I mean if the ostwind would be buffed to say 720 hp might be acceptable.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 17:09 PMdistrofio

i answered with a COMPARABLE OKW performance.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 17:34 PMT.R. Stormjäger

How is that relevant? Stuka zu fuβ is locked behind Mech HQ which is expensive, locks out healing, and only has a light tank and a light TD alongside it. This proposal would put the panzerwerfer in a cheap tier with a great generalist medium tank and a great medium TD.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 19:50 PMWiderstreit

If you want to write in German, then us the correct Eszett "ß" and not greek beta

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 18:12 PMelchino7

Dejavu, i've seen this suggestion before.



As in the past, i don't think it will prosper at all. There are enough cons to offset any pros the idea might bring.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 20:40 PMdistrofio

I want to know, which drawbacks does the Pwerfer on T3 generate?

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 20:43 PMT.R. Stormjäger

You're giving Ostheer the most late AA in the game.

You're denying Ostheer a pure AI medium vehicle until a premium tier.

You're putting the Ostwind and the Brummbar on the same tier which makes 0 sense since they do the same thing.

You're allowing Ostheer players to get the rapid flame halftruck&puma combo with smoke cannisters, then rush the T3 panzerwerfer which deletes AT gun counterplay.