I like that idea too... also rip
Yeah then hull down 75(yes 60*1.25=75 range dude 75!!!!) range panthers gonna come and ruin every allied tank on the planet.
Posts: 1563
I like that idea too... also rip
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The Comet has 290 armor + 960 HP now + Cheaper. Why the fuck is that????? Don't bullshit me,
Stugs and Jaegs don't even have as much point blank pen.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
The Comet has 290 armor + 960 HP now + Cheaper. Why the fuck is that????? Don't bullshit me,
Stugs and Jaegs don't even have as much point-blank pen.
Posts: 366
Posts: 1563
You mean 290 armor and 800 hp?
Also, StuGs and JP4s(assuming you meant that) are not supposed to counter it, in fact, its supposed to give panther a beating before it goes down.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Right TD's are not supposed to counter tanks. Good Answer.
Posts: 124
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Panther need 290 armor for sure.Panther is confused kid of axis. Panther dont know what it is. Players dont know what is it. Devs dont know what is it.Just increase anti infantry potential of panther and buff armor into 290 and give it a proper place. Problem solved case closed.
Posts: 857 | Subs: 2
And then, you'd complain that panther costs 200+ fuel.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
A Panther with decent AI (lets say P4 AI) would certainly justify the cost of 200+ fuel and im pretty dawn sure that most axis players would make this trade in a second.
A Panther with better ai performance would also help to get rid of the "Tiger always"
meta atm.
Posts: 808
You asked why it has 286 armour.
It's because it exchanged higher armour for health to make it more survivable against tank destroyers.
The health is much more powerful than the armour. I don't see why you'd want to revert that.
Posts: 808
A Panther with decent AI (lets say P4 AI) would certainly justify the cost of 200+ fuel and im pretty dawn sure that most axis players would make this trade in a second.
A Panther with better ai performance would also help to get rid of the "Tiger always"
meta atm.
Posts: 124
And then, you'd complain that panther costs 200+ fuel.
Posts: 124
lol, that would make panther OP, especially in teams games ppl will just spam panthers and stomp everything
Posts: 1563
Puma is a TD.
Its not supposed to counter KV-1.
Apply that logic one tier higher if its too hard to understand.
Posts: 808
İn team games people spam p4 btw.
Posts: 1563
previously, the when the panther was at 800hp, it got its extra HP at vet 2 to 960hp, it didn't get the free hp, it was merely taken from its vet 2, while having its armour go down. Before the panther changes, the old panther had better defensive stats then the new panther at vet 2.
Regarding OP's suggestion, i dont think these changes will do much and shouldn't be implemented, plus i think some TD's are going to be getting nerfed anyway (most likely jackon). Right now if panther does get a buff, it will most likely be in accuracy
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Puma is more like an anti vehicle unit than a TD m8. The same way shreck PG's are like av units.
Posts: 1563
It might blow your mind, but units dedicated to destroying vehicles are called TDs.
If you think its light vehicle exclusive, please explain then why it needs 160 close penetration, when there is no spammable light with more then 70 armor?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
A Panther with decent AI (lets say P4 AI) would certainly justify the cost of 200+ fuel and im pretty dawn sure that most axis players would make this trade in a second.
A Panther with better ai performance would also help to get rid of the "Tiger always"
meta atm.
4 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |