Are they not fixing heavies?
Posts: 808
All heavy tanks just need a delay
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
We are still in WIP and discussing it. Alot of difference opionen
Posts: 3260
yes, tiger and is2 can wipe sqauds, but the Pershing is the worst offender, and stop giving me this bs like it has low armour and low health, its still high for a tank.
All heavy tanks just need a delay
To be honest, they need their stats cut or their price raised too.
They're currently set up like they're a tier above medium tanks, but they share the same teching cost.
Imagine what'd happen if you let a doctrine put the OKW Panzer IV in Mechanized, and you've got the effect heavies have.
Currently, for the cost of two mediums tanks: they've got the anti-infantry power of two medium tanks, the health of two mediums stuck together, the AT power of a tank destroyer, and a shitload of armour on top of that. You get everything and more.
It's like they're equivalent to two Shermans and a Jackson, which is 365 Fuel.
I think the best solution is to slash their anti-infantry power down a ton. Their power should be in their durability.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
...
Their power should be in their durability.
Lower base stat and increase vet bonuses might also help. The unit would become power after a player managed to vet them up.
Posts: 3260
Lower base stat and increase vet bonuses might also help. The unit would become power after a player managed to vet them up.
The problem there is making them highly vet dependent encourages building them sooner. Heavy rushing is what we're trying to kill.
Posts: 808
To be honest, they need their stats cut or their price raised too.
They're currently set up like they're a tier above medium tanks, but they share the same teching cost.
Imagine what'd happen if you let a doctrine put the OKW Panzer IV in Mechanized, and you've got the effect heavies have.
Currently, for the cost of two mediums tanks: they've got the anti-infantry power of two medium tanks, the health of two mediums stuck together, the AT power of a tank destroyer, and a shitload of armour on top of that. You get everything and more.
It's like they're equivalent to two Shermans and a Jackson, which is 365 Fuel.
I think the best solution is to slash their anti-infantry power down a ton. Their power should be in their durability.
then give them a flat out price increase. not a performance nerf, no one is guna want to spend 230+ fuel on a tank that doesn't perform well in AI and AT
Posts: 833
KT is just kinda trash in comparison to vet command tiger, and that's simply down to inferior RoF and mobility. Stuff like armour and health mean very little, RoF is king. Hence why old vet 3 Pershing was a monster.
Honestly I have no issue with these tanks coming early if they weren't so crazy strong and mediums had a chance at penetrating more than half their shots. Right now you could charge a tiger with three Sherman's and still lose.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The problem there is making them highly vet dependent encourages building them sooner. Heavy rushing is what we're trying to kill.
Timing is adjusted by the CP/tech changes not performance.
Posts: 1563
i had a tiger killing my schocks in 2 shots (1 shot then i retreated got them on the retreat), so does the is2 with grens, the problem is the tiger gets much higher rof with vet making him capable of landing more shots in then the is2, making him overall better then the is2 (against inf).
Sqad size doesnt really matter that much against heavies becouse of sqad bunching etc.
This is not even due to misplay, you sit in green cover bunched , see the heavy retreat close together and get wiped. Thats why the tiger seems oppresive since in can get more shots in then the is2
Edit: If the is2 gets his YOLO armor nerf, so should the tiger be looked at, since its vet doesnt fit in well with the changes + it has lower vet requirements than the is2, for no apparent reason, while having higher damage output
The Tiger has 300, How low do you want it to be, it seems like you allied fanboy's won't be satisfied until you can pen everything with 200 mp at guns from a range of 120.
Let's just give all axis armor 40 armor caus allied fanboy juat want it there way. Then fucking first nerf all your infantry.
Posts: 306
The Tiger has 300, How low do you want it to be, it seems like you allied fanboy's won't be satisfied until you can pen everything with 200 mp at guns from a range of 120.
Let's just give all axis armor 40 armor caus allied fanboy juat want it there way. Then fucking first nerf all your infantry.
XD is2 gets armor nerf, and i would suggest nerfing tigers ROF or at least increasing vet requirements. I didnt mention tiger armor nerf at all..., its armor is fine
BTW check my stats and rethink before you call me a allied fanboy
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
The Tiger's main gun might also be bugged in live as it has a greater OHK radius than it should have. If the editor is correct, its AOE distance is 1/1.5/3 rather than 0.25/1.5/3 which might explains its more chances of killing people.
Posts: 479
You see the problem with full tech requirement would be that IS2 would only be delayed by 10 fuel and the rest would be delayed by 60-70 fuel. Which is not consistent + IS2 is the most power full of all the heavies right now so...... Yeah would not be fair to anyone.
I think the IS-2 and KV-2 should require all-tiers and Molo's and AT Nades to be teched in order to build them. If that isn't enough to delay the timing then worst case maybe you even require the 7-man upgrade but I don't think that would even be needed honestly.
Posts: 1563
XD is2 gets armor nerf, and i would suggest nerfing tigers ROF or at least increasing vet requirements. I didnt mention tiger armor nerf at all..., its armor is fine
BTW check my stats and rethink before you call me a allied fanboy
Anyone can be fanboy. Fanboyism is in the heart not the hands. Stats don't prove anything.
Posts: 1563
I think the IS-2 and KV-2 should require all-tiers and Molo's and AT Nades to be teched in order to build them. If that isn't enough to delay the timing then worst case maybe you even require the 7-man upgrade but I don't think that would even be needed honestly.
Here is the thing, By the time you see IS2 in game if your sov opponent is going cons they certainly have both molies and at nades(these 2 are 10 fuel each) well before they have t70. Which if IS2 seems fast now 10 fuel isn't gonna make it come any slower.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Anyone can be fanboy. Fanboyism is in the heart not the hands. Stats don't prove anything.
Yes everyone who wants a Tiger nerf is clearly an Allied-Fanboy.
Posts: 479
Here is the thing, By the time you see IS2 in game if your sov opponent is going cons they certainly have both molies and at nades(these 2 are 10 fuel each) well before they have t70. Which if IS2 seems fast now 10 fuel isn't gonna make it come any slower.
That is also why Mobilized Reserves could be an additional tech cost, I feel like the 7-man upgrade in its current state shouldn't be given for free when you go Tier 4.
Posts: 1563
Yes everyone who wants a Tiger nerf is clearly an Allied-Fanboy.
Yes, Cus All Heavis are OP not Just the Tiger. So if you wan't a nerf for Tiger only,then they are a fan boy.
**ohhh.. BUT THE IS2 GOT IT'S ARMOR NERFED TO 340 FROM 375 which gives stugs a pen boost of 46% to 50%(panther 53% to 59% both max range) which hardly is any different.
Posts: 1392
Yes, Cus All Heavis are OP not Just the Tiger. So if you wan't a nerf for Tiger only,then they are a fan boy.
**ohhh.. BUT THE IS2 GOT IT'S ARMOR NERFED TO 340 FROM 375 which gives stugs a pen boost of 46% to 50%(panther 53% to 59% both max range) which hardly is any different.
blvckdream is often trolling, don't take him so seriously.
Posts: 1563
That is also why Mobilized Reserves could be an additional tech cost, I feel like the 7-man upgrade in its current state shouldn't be given for free when you go Tier 4.
Here'a good question. That like asking for player to spend resources on stuff they might not need. If you went penals neither molly, at nades, mob reserve does anything. Delaying the thing is fine but why lock it behind potentially unnecessary side tech.
Posts: 1563
blvckdream is often trolling, don't take him so seriously.
Yeah.. but I'm trolling too.
Livestreams
12 | |||||
11 | |||||
15 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.943410.697+9
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.269143.653+2
- 10.10629.785+7
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
10 posts in the last week
29 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, hekom17
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM