Give RETs the ability to build sandbags.
Change tank traps to yellow cover.
Sandbags for RETs
30 Jan 2020, 22:30 PM
#1
Posts: 3260
30 Jan 2020, 22:33 PM
#2
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Nah I like how they do it differently.
 | Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
30 Jan 2020, 22:39 PM
#3
Posts: 3260
Nah I like how they do it differently.
And I think this shouldn't be green cover.
30 Jan 2020, 22:53 PM
#4
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Lol tank traps providing green cover is one of the silliest things in the entire game
Sandbags should only be built by engies and conscripts. Everyone else can lose them imo
Sandbags should only be built by engies and conscripts. Everyone else can lose them imo
30 Jan 2020, 23:20 PM
#5
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
And I think this shouldn't be green cover.
Worked perfectly fine on Omaha beach, however it wasn't placed by allies back then.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
30 Jan 2020, 23:35 PM
#6
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedHow about no. USF is the most aggressive faction and doesn't deserve all of the perks of more defensive factions. They already get non-doc mines, and normal mines in HALF of the doctrines. Make do with tank traps.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
31 Jan 2020, 00:04 AM
#7
Posts: 3260
How about no. USF is the most aggressive faction and doesn't deserve all of the perks of more defensive factions. They already get non-doc mines, and normal mines in HALF of the doctrines. Make do with tank traps.
If you weren't so drunk on your one-faction balance crusade you'd know tank tanks are better than sandbags because of the build speed.
31 Jan 2020, 00:07 AM
#8
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
If you weren't so drunk on your one-faction balance crusade you'd know tank tanks are better than sandbags because of the build speed.
But I'd rather face tank traps because a 5man squad can't use them effectively enough to prevent suppression.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
31 Jan 2020, 00:21 AM
#9
Posts: 3260
But I'd rather face tank traps because a 5man squad can't use them effectively enough to prevent suppression.
If they only build one tank trap.
You don't only build one tank trap if you're using them for cover.
31 Jan 2020, 00:35 AM
#10
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Give RETs the ability to build sandbags.
I would say make the field defense give the built option to RE and wire/Tank traps to riflemen.
Imo mainline infatry should not be able to build heavy cover (or they should so is very low speed.)
Conscripts might be an exception unless they continue to receive buffs.
Change tank traps to yellow cover.
Agreed and have made the same suggestion many times. In addition increase build time reduce size and maybe add resistance to ballistic weapons. Currently a tank can easily destroy them with its main gun.
31 Jan 2020, 02:04 AM
#11
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
If they only build one tank trap.
You don't only build one tank trap if you're using them for cover.
Most of the time, u only have time to build one.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
31 Jan 2020, 02:32 AM
#12
Posts: 66
IMO REs should be able to build sandbagsconsidering every faction but USF can build sandbags. Tank traps are unreliable compared to sandbags.
Give those Rear Echelon some love......
31 Jan 2020, 02:33 AM
#13
Posts: 3260
Most of the time, u only have time to build one.
If you only have the time to build one tank trap, you don't have time to build a sandbag.
Your assertion that it'd be a buff to USF remains ridiculous.
31 Jan 2020, 03:11 AM
#14
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedUSF is in a very good spot right now, there's no need to do buff anything for USF. Where's the pak howi nerf, where's the officer fix for the unintended rifle buff. Who gives a shit if usf doesn't have sandbags. It's winrate, like hte Soviets is above average.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
31 Jan 2020, 04:25 AM
#15
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Imo mainline infatry should not be able to build heavy cover (or they should so is very low speed.)
Conscripts might be an exception unless they continue to receive buffs.
Also infantry sections since their snare are in the hand of royal engineer.
Agreed and have made the same suggestion many times. In addition increase build time reduce size and maybe add resistance to ballistic weapons. Currently a tank can easily destroy them with its main gun.
As i see, this is more of a QOL improve. As USF will have ACTUAL cover, and tank traps are better in stopping tank.
31 Jan 2020, 04:28 AM
#16
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
How about no. USF is the most aggressive faction and doesn't deserve all of the perks of more defensive factions. They already get non-doc mines, and normal mines in HALF of the doctrines. Make do with tank traps.
What about OKW, they are a very aggressive faction, too, but still, they event have sandbags on mainline, MG and AT at HQ, stock mines, etc.
31 Jan 2020, 04:37 AM
#17
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
What about OKW, they are a very aggressive faction, too, but still, they event have sandbags on mainline, MG and AT at HQ, stock mines, etc.
I wanted to get rid of volk bags. I don't think they deserve them either. Bal team, as usual, doesn't listen. Instead buffs rifles to the point u can charge volk bags with rifles in the early game.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
31 Jan 2020, 06:53 AM
#18
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedIMO REs should be able to build sandbagsconsidering every faction but USF can build sandbags. Tank traps are unreliable compared to sandbags.
Sounds like Ostheer needs a stock puma cuz "aLL tHe otHEr fAcTIonS" have a stock, bulletproof vehicle. Just stop it. Please.
"I wish THQ was still alive and made CoH2. Ostheer for life."
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
PLAYERCARD: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198287328305
31 Jan 2020, 07:10 AM
#19
Posts: 66
Jezus why are u so against the sandbags? Unlike the difference between other factions each give each a sense of uniqueness. I am just saying RE should be given sandbags and the tank taps turned to yellow cover.. im not asking to buff pack howitzer AOE or buff jackson range.
Sounds like Ostheer needs a stock puma cuz "aLL tHe otHEr fAcTIonS" have a stock, bulletproof vehicle. Just stop it. Please.
Give those Rear Echelon some love......
31 Jan 2020, 07:23 AM
#20
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Worked perfectly fine on Omaha beach
Did it? I don't think too many people hung around very long to find out...
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
860 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
885 users are online:
885 guests
1 post in the last 24h
11 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
11 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50002
Welcome our newest member, rwintoday1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, rwintoday1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM