Sandbags for RETs
![avatar of Lago](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 3260
Change tank traps to yellow cover.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
![avatar of Lago](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 3260
Nah I like how they do it differently.
And I think this shouldn't be green cover.
![](https://i.imgur.com/o4rCqeK.jpg)
![avatar of SkysTheLimit](/images/avatars/rear_echelons.png?updated=1440837436)
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Sandbags should only be built by engies and conscripts. Everyone else can lose them imo
![avatar of Katitof](/images/avatars/partisan_at.png?updated=1414778183)
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
And I think this shouldn't be green cover.
Worked perfectly fine on Omaha beach, however it wasn't placed by allies back then.
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned![avatar of Lago](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 3260
How about no. USF is the most aggressive faction and doesn't deserve all of the perks of more defensive factions. They already get non-doc mines, and normal mines in HALF of the doctrines. Make do with tank traps.
If you weren't so drunk on your one-faction balance crusade you'd know tank tanks are better than sandbags because of the build speed.
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
If you weren't so drunk on your one-faction balance crusade you'd know tank tanks are better than sandbags because of the build speed.
But I'd rather face tank traps because a 5man squad can't use them effectively enough to prevent suppression.
![avatar of Lago](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 3260
But I'd rather face tank traps because a 5man squad can't use them effectively enough to prevent suppression.
If they only build one tank trap.
You don't only build one tank trap if you're using them for cover.
![avatar of Vipper](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Give RETs the ability to build sandbags.
I would say make the field defense give the built option to RE and wire/Tank traps to riflemen.
Imo mainline infatry should not be able to build heavy cover (or they should so is very low speed.)
Conscripts might be an exception unless they continue to receive buffs.
Change tank traps to yellow cover.
Agreed and have made the same suggestion many times. In addition increase build time reduce size and maybe add resistance to ballistic weapons. Currently a tank can easily destroy them with its main gun.
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
If they only build one tank trap.
You don't only build one tank trap if you're using them for cover.
Most of the time, u only have time to build one.
![avatar of Toxicfirebal](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 66
![avatar of Lago](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 3260
Most of the time, u only have time to build one.
If you only have the time to build one tank trap, you don't have time to build a sandbag.
Your assertion that it'd be a buff to USF remains ridiculous.
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned![avatar of Support Sapper](/uploads/avatar/41907.png?updated=1653299013)
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Imo mainline infatry should not be able to build heavy cover (or they should so is very low speed.)
Conscripts might be an exception unless they continue to receive buffs.
Also infantry sections since their snare are in the hand of royal engineer.
Agreed and have made the same suggestion many times. In addition increase build time reduce size and maybe add resistance to ballistic weapons. Currently a tank can easily destroy them with its main gun.
As i see, this is more of a QOL improve. As USF will have ACTUAL cover, and tank traps are better in stopping tank.
![avatar of Support Sapper](/uploads/avatar/41907.png?updated=1653299013)
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
How about no. USF is the most aggressive faction and doesn't deserve all of the perks of more defensive factions. They already get non-doc mines, and normal mines in HALF of the doctrines. Make do with tank traps.
What about OKW, they are a very aggressive faction, too, but still, they event have sandbags on mainline, MG and AT at HQ, stock mines, etc.
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
What about OKW, they are a very aggressive faction, too, but still, they event have sandbags on mainline, MG and AT at HQ, stock mines, etc.
I wanted to get rid of volk bags. I don't think they deserve them either. Bal team, as usual, doesn't listen. Instead buffs rifles to the point u can charge volk bags with rifles in the early game.
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedIMO REs should be able to build sandbagsconsidering every faction but USF can build sandbags. Tank traps are unreliable compared to sandbags.
Sounds like Ostheer needs a stock puma cuz "aLL tHe otHEr fAcTIonS" have a stock, bulletproof vehicle. Just stop it. Please.
![avatar of Toxicfirebal](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 66
Jezus why are u so against the sandbags? Unlike the difference between other factions each give each a sense of uniqueness. I am just saying RE should be given sandbags and the tank taps turned to yellow cover.. im not asking to buff pack howitzer AOE or buff jackson range.
Sounds like Ostheer needs a stock puma cuz "aLL tHe otHEr fAcTIonS" have a stock, bulletproof vehicle. Just stop it. Please.
![avatar of SkysTheLimit](/images/avatars/rear_echelons.png?updated=1440837436)
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Worked perfectly fine on Omaha beach
Did it? I don't think too many people hung around very long to find out...
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
32 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
32 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.41862.871+16
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.286110.722-2
- 4.299162.649-4
- 5.309114.730+5
- 6.12243.739-1
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.10829.788+9
- 9.370283.567+3
- 10.1171650.643+2
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
![Einhoven Country](/images/maps/4p_enhoven_country.jpg)
![Honor](/images/buttons/HONOR_icon.png)
![Download](/images/buttons/DOWNLOAD_icon.png)
Board Info
17 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Kucht236
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM