Kv2 is underperforming

This thread is locked

New topic

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

At some point you have to concede to what the community use as terminology.

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

28 Dec 2019, 18:48 PMWiderstreit

We are speaking about normal units and the fighting ability.

No you're talking about Engineers who's primary role is specifically NOT fighting. If you're gonna point out their cost difference you cannot focus on dps...

Tellers, bunkers, sandbags. They have plenty of things going for them over CEs

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned

this is about KV2

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

29 Dec 2019, 11:32 AMWiderstreit

I spoke about the fighting, if you can read the texed you reacted correctly.

I know what you spoke about, the entire point I'm making is that you chose to focus on fighting for a unit who's job isn't to fight...

You're saying CEs overperform for cost compared to pios, but only based on their fighting ability. Maybe compare the entire unit instead of focusing on one thing that isn't even their main job?

And like a few others have said, pios are just as good if not better in combat. You're wrong on multiple accounts

29 Dec 2019, 15:36 PMRitter

this is about KV2

Kv2 is fine. You might literally be the only person who thinks it's bad

Posts: 1392

29 Dec 2019, 17:47 PMSkysTheLimit

I know what you spoke about, the entire point I'm making is that you chose to focus on fighting for a unit who's job isn't to fight...

Yep. But last tiem Ostheer Piospam was a thing was 4 years ago. CE still performs.

I am fine with the situation, but I am pointing at it. Because the balcing team su**s, because they are looking at situation most player doesn't have and maybe are fine in 1vs1 most people doesn't play. lyl