I don't consider Riflemen all that good because they are the least cost-efficient infantry unit in the game. Too expensive for their initial cost
I am sorry are we playing the same game?
Posts: 66
I don't consider Riflemen all that good because they are the least cost-efficient infantry unit in the game. Too expensive for their initial cost
Posts: 66
Posts: 5279
that's codguy. If it's usf it's UP. no exceptions.
I am sorry are we playing the same game?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
that's codguy. If it's usf it's UP. no exceptions.
Posts: 211
Posts: 479
Posts: 888
Honestly I prefer Assault Grens to regular Grens at least in 1v1. Don't mind mixing them together though to have snares.
Posts: 789
Been playing Ost and I have to say I think right now the Grenadiers work the best as a "mainline" infantry. They cost very little and require no side techs and no vet for abilities. Volksgrenadiers used to be the best but after this last patch it seems like Grens have taken the mantle.
I don't consider Riflemen all that good because they are the least cost-efficient infantry unit in the game. Too expensive for their initial cost, too expenisve and time consuming for weapon rack upgrades, snare locked behind vet which isn't a quick process for them to vet up. They're really not that good when you factor in these extremely high costs. Most USF units have a very high cost but I think Riflemen have among the highest cost-benefit radio of any unit.
Tommies used to be the best Allied mainline infantry but the balance team took care of that last patch.
Consripts are probably the best Allied mainline right now with that 7th man upgrade. Takes a while to get there but once they do they are a pretty tough late game unit.
5 | |||||
242 | |||||
26 | |||||
9 | |||||
3 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 |